• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

$5,000 Rep Panerai 243 on eBay

Raddave

Most Delicious of all Nipples!
Staff member
Global Moderator
Administrator
Certified
24/12/11
67,017
18,605
113
That looks pretty gen to me.....esp the pearl which looks to have a glass cover on it which our reps dont


The patina looks right for a tritium model as well


$_57.JPG
 

Marius13

Active Member
Certified
23/9/14
303
48
28
Albania
As we have said before , people will mostly say your gen is a rep, than believe that our rep is a gen. It's just our envious human nature !!!

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
 

barth

Respected Member
5/10/12
3,483
111
63
OP...

Looks like you found the perfect replica 100% :rofl:
 
D

d4m.test

Guest
Every time there is a thread like this, I´d love the op to describe the tells in detail and what makes him think/ be sure it´s a rep. Noobs like me could learn "why" as I can´t tell them apart and other members could reinforce and add or contest point by point.
 

cybee

Legendary Member
Supporter
23/11/06
11,134
30
48
That gen has a crooked 30 marker...better send it back to the TD :laugh:
 

ryantunna

I'm Pretty Popular
8/7/14
1,675
118
63
Yeah, the no papers and crooked 30 marker would worry me a little too much...
 

cybee

Legendary Member
Supporter
23/11/06
11,134
30
48
My only point was that gens are not perfect either but for 5K that issue would bug me.
 

subaruski

Active Member
8/12/13
226
0
16
Yeah, that is a little strange... but looking at a few other gen versions on Chrono24 it seems to be common. I think the pearl on this one is dead give away that it is gen.

That gen has a crooked 30 marker...better send it back to the TD :laugh:

$_57.JPG
 

trailboss99

Head Honcho - Cat Herder
Staff member
Administrator
Certified
30/3/08
43,548
17,117
113
Why does OP think it's rep?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1, what made you think this is a fake [MENTION=105047]gdgtman[/MENTION] ? Maybe we are missing something here . . .