47mm submersible without date cyclops?

[Tickman]

What are some good 47mm subs without the date cyclops?

 

[erick510]

Pam 389, 187 with date 305

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

 

[Tickman]

Thanks. 389 bezel is too dark for me. 187 is to busy. 305 is perfect and evaluated as a first class rep. Is the updated 1305 with the blue accents a better option to the 305?

 

[Hazing]

Without the date function? Or without the magnified date bubble?

If you dont don’t mind the date but you’re just annoyed by the magnification bubble (this bothers me too) you can go with the 719 pole to pole, the new 692, the 984, the 985. They all have the date but it’s not obscured or distorted by the mag bubble. They’re all titanium models too. You also have the 1616 and the 799 which aren’t in titanium fully.

 

[Twinny]

The 571 is amazing too. Full titanium an without date bubble.

 

[Tickman]

Without the date function? Or without the magnified date bubble?

If you dont don’t mind the date but you’re just annoyed by the magnification bubble (this bothers me too) you can go with the 719 pole to pole, the new 692, the 984, the 985. They all have the date but it’s not obscured or distorted by the mag bubble. They’re all titanium models too. You also have the 1616 and the 799 which aren’t in titanium fully.

Thank you I think we have similar taste. The magnification is annoying so I prefer no cyclops and having no date is fine too. No date means less stuff to set when I leave a watch in the box for a few days. The 719 is nice but the extra GMT hand keeps grabbing my eye first when I check the time. I just want a simple hour and second hand. I really like the 692. I like the 984 but it's a $20,500 piece and not believable with my lifestyle. I will think about it when I have it on my wrist. 985 is nice but double the price and only 19 created so even further away from 984. 1616 and 799 are too dark, I have some other all black or partially black PAMS and they don't get much wrist time anymore.

 

[KOT1917]

I think it will be harder to find 47mm., Sub "with" cyclops besides pam285 and pam194.
But if there is no date at all, then I'm afraid only 202/225 comes to mind ...
Everything else is 47mm., Submersibles will have a date without a cyclops. Maybe of course, I missed something in this equation ..

 

[Tickman]

The 571 is amazing too. Full titanium an without date bubble.

Thank you the 571 looks great. Evaluated as a super rep. 1 of 50 pieces but very classic looking it would be hard to call it out. Retail on gen is $10,400. Now to find one on M2M.

 

[Tickman]

I think it will be harder to find 47mm., Sub "with" cyclops besides pam285 and pam194.
But if there is no date at all, then I'm afraid only 202/225 comes to mind ...
Everything else is 47mm., Submersibles will have a date without a cyclops. Maybe of course, I missed something in this equation ..

I'm looking for any 47mm with no cyclops or no date. Either is fine. The cyclops is too much distortion for me when I glance at the time from an angle.

 

[Swiss_goupil]

Pam692


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[macarone]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[up_right]

pam364 also, if you can find one!

 

[mysterio]

PAM1389, PAM305, PAM1305, PAM571, PAM692