44mm PAMs attract our attention most of the time. What about our dearly 40mm PAMs? Have we forgotten about them?
Here's a quick look at each model. Hope the information will help those who is thinking of getting one to make the best selection
and also that the 40mm PAMs will gain more popularity like their "big" 44mm brothers.
*Experts, please throw in any information I miss out to make this post the most complete 40mm PAMs info center
For PAM049 automatic
The flaws are
1.) Poor cyclop mag power
2.) Incorrect "skinny" date font. Gen uses a bolder font.
3.) Lume is too green
4.) Shorter hour hand
Plus point
1.) Correct solid caseback (mostly C series for reps)
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Check out Lello's latest datewheel that will fit both swiss or asian 7750
2.) Relume recommended
For PAM050 automatic
The flaws are
1.) Poor cyclop mag power
2.) Incorrect "skinny" date font. Gen uses a bolder font.
Plus point
1.) Correct solid caseback (mostly C series for reps)
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Check out Lello's latest datewheel that will fit both swiss or asian 7750
2.) Relume recommended
PAM168 Chrono
The flaws are
1.) Shorter hour hand
2.) "TM" engravement behind the caseback is incorrect ("TN" on rep)
3.) "Stainless steel" behind the caseback is incorrect ("Titanium" on gen)
4.) Date wheel back ground should be blue not black
5.) Recessed date (same problem as PAM196)
6.) Position for the "10" and "20" on the sub dial at 3 o'clock is incorrect (same problem as PAM212, 196 etc)
Plus point
1.) Lume colour looks correct
2.) Crown thickness is correct
PAM60 chrono
(Pic borrowed from TT)
The flaws are
1.) The one and only deadgiveaway flaw - Display caseback on gen on incorrect solid caseback on rep
Plus point
1.) Position for the "10" and "20" on the sub dial at 3 o'clock is correct on this one
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Almost impossible to have the display caseback. The rep factory never make this as far as I know
Backcase pic for PAM049, 050 and 168
Pointers to help you decide better
PAM049 - If not for the shorter hour hand and "skinny" date wheel, it is very close to the gen
PAM050 - Best one out of the 4 models with the least flaw but with relume and Lello's Date wheel. It is scarily close to the gen
PAM168 - Too many flaws but the blue dials looks cool
PAM60 - Except for the wrong solid caseback. It has the best dial of all.
My vote goes to PAM050.
How about you?
Thanks for viewing
Here's a quick look at each model. Hope the information will help those who is thinking of getting one to make the best selection
and also that the 40mm PAMs will gain more popularity like their "big" 44mm brothers.
*Experts, please throw in any information I miss out to make this post the most complete 40mm PAMs info center
For PAM049 automatic
The flaws are
1.) Poor cyclop mag power
2.) Incorrect "skinny" date font. Gen uses a bolder font.
3.) Lume is too green
4.) Shorter hour hand
Plus point
1.) Correct solid caseback (mostly C series for reps)
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Check out Lello's latest datewheel that will fit both swiss or asian 7750
2.) Relume recommended
For PAM050 automatic
The flaws are
1.) Poor cyclop mag power
2.) Incorrect "skinny" date font. Gen uses a bolder font.
Plus point
1.) Correct solid caseback (mostly C series for reps)
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Check out Lello's latest datewheel that will fit both swiss or asian 7750
2.) Relume recommended
PAM168 Chrono
The flaws are
1.) Shorter hour hand
2.) "TM" engravement behind the caseback is incorrect ("TN" on rep)
3.) "Stainless steel" behind the caseback is incorrect ("Titanium" on gen)
4.) Date wheel back ground should be blue not black
5.) Recessed date (same problem as PAM196)
6.) Position for the "10" and "20" on the sub dial at 3 o'clock is incorrect (same problem as PAM212, 196 etc)
Plus point
1.) Lume colour looks correct
2.) Crown thickness is correct
PAM60 chrono
(Pic borrowed from TT)
The flaws are
1.) The one and only deadgiveaway flaw - Display caseback on gen on incorrect solid caseback on rep
Plus point
1.) Position for the "10" and "20" on the sub dial at 3 o'clock is correct on this one
2.) Crown thickness is correct
Mod
1.) Almost impossible to have the display caseback. The rep factory never make this as far as I know
Backcase pic for PAM049, 050 and 168
Pointers to help you decide better
PAM049 - If not for the shorter hour hand and "skinny" date wheel, it is very close to the gen
PAM050 - Best one out of the 4 models with the least flaw but with relume and Lello's Date wheel. It is scarily close to the gen
PAM168 - Too many flaws but the blue dials looks cool
PAM60 - Except for the wrong solid caseback. It has the best dial of all.
My vote goes to PAM050.
How about you?
Thanks for viewing