So I was fortunate enough to get my hands on some genuine pieces for the 3777. I didn't observe and compare in detail since the rep seems to be really good and I was busy with a lot of other things.
If you see other things or I point out something wrong, feel free to speak your mind.
Dial:
The texture/color seems pretty spot on. Even the red triangle is an improvement over the Mark XVII.
Flaws:
Day/Date wheels:
- The rep looks just like the gen!
Crown:
- The "Probus Scafusia" engraving on the gen is very smooth whereas the rep is very 'ridge-like'
- They both have the same threading so they can be interchangeable with either the rep or gen tube (3717 was one or the other)
Dial
DWo
Crown
My take on it is that the 3777 is definitely a super rep! It's really heavy too so people think it's real
If you see other things or I point out something wrong, feel free to speak your mind.
Dial:
The texture/color seems pretty spot on. Even the red triangle is an improvement over the Mark XVII.
Flaws:
- The lume is horribly applied. You can see the photos below where they're not evenly applied to the dial. Also it's hard to see from these photos but it has an off-white color compared to the hands and numeral markings (similar to the rep 3717)
- The font looks to be very similar to the gen but the only discrepancy is that the rep font is just a little bolder, as indicated by the "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN" logo
Day/Date wheels:
- The rep looks just like the gen!
Crown:
- The "Probus Scafusia" engraving on the gen is very smooth whereas the rep is very 'ridge-like'
- They both have the same threading so they can be interchangeable with either the rep or gen tube (3717 was one or the other)
Dial
DWo
Crown
My take on it is that the 3777 is definitely a super rep! It's really heavy too so people think it's real