- 23/8/07
- 347
- 0
- 0
Only have moment, and will type more later. But the 164N is two thumbs down in one big area. The magnifier is about as bad as it gets. The cyclops distorts the date so bad, it looks horrible. And there is something that looks glued under cyclops that makes the crystal look scratched. Major disappointment. There is also a speck of dirt/dust under the crystal. HORRIBLE-
I owned a Gen 164 for 4 years before I sold it. I know the cyclops well. My avatar pic on RG is of my gen 164. I wear a gen rare 027a. I only have ever worn Pams with cyclops. I purchased my 164 direct from the panerai boutique in CA. I know normal cyclops and this isn't one. Plus there is debris under the crystal, as well as the quick release button for the strap popped out already. The cyclops is so poor is catches light and makes the date way to distorted, and it refracts light so it looks scratched.
The quick release worked twice before the botton flew out
I was super excited to see this "noob" factory watch, but my DSNs are 100x better.
I rewatched the video (which is really awesome PT) but my cylops is WAY more distorted.
Just BWI I don't intend for it to be perfect to my gen. I'd never think that, and understand what reps are all about. BUT for $338 two thumbs down..... I may try the H factory version and compare.
I rec'd a PM from Angus, and must say that I'm kinda shock at the PMed response. I will not comment out of respect on this defective watch, or post pictures for the moment.
Shocked in a positive or negative Way ;-)
...
I was super excited to see this "noob" factory watch, but my DSNs are 100x better.
I rewatched the video (which is really awesome PT) but my cylops is WAY more distorted.
Just BWI I don't intend for it to be perfect to my gen. I'd never think that, and understand what reps are all about. BUT for $338 two thumbs down..... I may try the H factory version and compare.