- 30/8/12
- 456
- 0
- 0
With all the chatter about the incorrect 12 (which I have) I decided to look closer at a watch I was previously happy with and also discovered the flaw of my serial number engraving being out of 2000 instead of 2500. The swan neck and incabloc of course, but I knew about that BEFORE I purchased so I had already come to terms with it. I heard the swan neck was a little rough, and it certainly is as it has scratches all over it. That still doesnt bother me as much as the dial and caseback engraving though as I was not aware before purchasing.
Is this watch even a V3? As trailboss had put it in on another post, should we call these V4's so there is some distinction? There are probably a lot of these out there from what I can tell. Just look at other members pics, there are plenty of bad dials. I mean, with how close the various PAM versions are, we really have to nitpick to know the difference. True, these flaws are small in the scheme of things, but not in my mind! I cant put it on my wrist anymore, anybody else feel the same or should I just calm the F down?
Is this watch even a V3? As trailboss had put it in on another post, should we call these V4's so there is some distinction? There are probably a lot of these out there from what I can tell. Just look at other members pics, there are plenty of bad dials. I mean, with how close the various PAM versions are, we really have to nitpick to know the difference. True, these flaws are small in the scheme of things, but not in my mind! I cant put it on my wrist anymore, anybody else feel the same or should I just calm the F down?