Positive said:Well as Tom Bolt said in the video about the quality of the Patek replica, if that replica only cost $300 then the genuine manufacturers are ripping people off.
CHStriker said:Nice video. I didn't know the Mille watches. And brazilians prefer Massa over Barrichello. And Senna over all =D
Positive said:Well as Tom Bolt said in the video about the quality of the Patek replica, if that replica only cost $300 then the genuine manufacturers are ripping people off.
I don't know how much it costs to produce a Patek, but there are other costs than material. You have to repay what you spent in research, designing... And for what I've been reading, those swiss manufacturers have their own assembly team. If here I pay 20 dollars/hour for housekeeping (70 bucks/week), imagine how much it costs to hire one of those swiss assemblers (the AVERAGE income here is 5000 usd/month). And another member told me that they spend a lot in advertising also. They can be ripping people off, but let's not assume until we know for sure.
opustitevkajenja said:The video promises to be a great watch, but.. has ANYONE gotten it to play in fullscreen? My eyes punish me every time I watch a video in such a small window, and it's really stupid and poor design/carelessness on the part of the site owners.
phillycheez said:CHStriker said:Nice video. I didn't know the Mille watches. And brazilians prefer Massa over Barrichello. And Senna over all =D
Positive said:Well as Tom Bolt said in the video about the quality of the Patek replica, if that replica only cost $300 then the genuine manufacturers are ripping people off.
I don't know how much it costs to produce a Patek, but there are other costs than material. You have to repay what you spent in research, designing... And for what I've been reading, those swiss manufacturers have their own assembly team. If here I pay 20 dollars/hour for housekeeping (70 bucks/week), imagine how much it costs to hire one of those swiss assemblers (the AVERAGE income here is 5000 usd/month). And another member told me that they spend a lot in advertising also. They can be ripping people off, but let's not assume until we know for sure.
its not the fact that they are ripping people off... people are paying for the name more than anything. its a watch, why should a patek cost $20,000. Research and design? rolex has not made any "big" changes in their watches for years. is it the movement? no, movements havent changes "that much" for years as well. and if anything these luxury watch companies are just taking a common movement and putting their own "twist" on it.
if my $160 explorer I has the same gen weight, looks exactly the same, and beats at 8 ticks... well lets face it. rolex, your ripping people off. i dont care if you use white gold on the dial markers. i cant tell the difference.
amen, this is the reality. if it looks great on my wrist, keeps time and functions as it should and for all intents and purposes it "appears" to be exactly the same....and as fakey says, nobody is giving a damn anyway about my watch except me, if i can afford to toss 10k on something the next guy can get for $200 bucks then these big companies are ripping people off in a way. they are paying for a "feeling of satisfaction", not the watch.