I am new to this site...so first and foremost, I cannot thank you all enough for the absolute wealth of information. I am breaking my posting strawberry here... :wink:
Your reviews and assistance to newcomers should be borderline prosecuted, because it has helped me immensely in the fine craft of replication...lol That being said, please let me politely mention one tiny criticism...not of anyone or of this site...just a lack of minor detail info. Geez...I don't want to get off on a bad foot with you guys but...OK, I'll shut up and get to it.
One thing surprises me regarding the several reviews of the Rolex Milgauss. I have read maybe 60+ threads and nobody has ridiculed the shortcomings of the second hand on every rep I've seen (D4M first documented the shortness by say 1mm with his keen eye) but there is something else completely wrong. The gen has an actual Z formation in the two bends of the fuzzy but the rep looks like its a totally square step. As I said I'm new, so I do not know how to post pics, but I would call for you to check our Daytona4Me's all inclusive review on here. Gen step to step is zig zagged...Rep step is stacked.
This is absolutely my favorite watch on the market right now...gen or rep, and I can't wait to own either. The gen will have to come much later lol. It's uniqueness and uni-tasker nature makes it a must have in my collection.
Ultimately I arrive at my point....is there a mod on the Milgauss second hand, dremmel grind recommendation, purchasable replacement, metal working class...to fix the "not-so-obvious to 99% of people" difference?
Thanks, all!
Your reviews and assistance to newcomers should be borderline prosecuted, because it has helped me immensely in the fine craft of replication...lol That being said, please let me politely mention one tiny criticism...not of anyone or of this site...just a lack of minor detail info. Geez...I don't want to get off on a bad foot with you guys but...OK, I'll shut up and get to it.
One thing surprises me regarding the several reviews of the Rolex Milgauss. I have read maybe 60+ threads and nobody has ridiculed the shortcomings of the second hand on every rep I've seen (D4M first documented the shortness by say 1mm with his keen eye) but there is something else completely wrong. The gen has an actual Z formation in the two bends of the fuzzy but the rep looks like its a totally square step. As I said I'm new, so I do not know how to post pics, but I would call for you to check our Daytona4Me's all inclusive review on here. Gen step to step is zig zagged...Rep step is stacked.
This is absolutely my favorite watch on the market right now...gen or rep, and I can't wait to own either. The gen will have to come much later lol. It's uniqueness and uni-tasker nature makes it a must have in my collection.
Ultimately I arrive at my point....is there a mod on the Milgauss second hand, dremmel grind recommendation, purchasable replacement, metal working class...to fix the "not-so-obvious to 99% of people" difference?
Thanks, all!