OK, I have studied up on this for a couple of weeks and all I would like is your opinion on ONLY these two watches. Which one is closer to gen? Please do not chime in with other makes and models. I am trying to get a consensus for only these two models:
WM9 (Watchmaker 9) 2007 Z-Serial Submariner 16610
VS.
Eurotimez Euromariner
I understand the fact that CG's are never perfect, inserts have to be milled down and that pearls have to be changed. The focus of this inquiry is to see which model has the more correct case dimensions, rehaut depth and rehaut thickness.
If you could buy either of the two watches (knowing that you could get the pearl changed out, the insert milled down and the CG's shaved) and also keeping in mind that they would come with the exact same ETA SWISS 2836-2 movement, which one would you buy?
Those of you in the know should have no problem voicing your opinions. Thanks!
(Edit: More pics of Euromariner are on page 3 of this thread)
WM9
Euromariner (yes you can get it without the engraved rehaut)
WM9 (Watchmaker 9) 2007 Z-Serial Submariner 16610
VS.
Eurotimez Euromariner
I understand the fact that CG's are never perfect, inserts have to be milled down and that pearls have to be changed. The focus of this inquiry is to see which model has the more correct case dimensions, rehaut depth and rehaut thickness.
If you could buy either of the two watches (knowing that you could get the pearl changed out, the insert milled down and the CG's shaved) and also keeping in mind that they would come with the exact same ETA SWISS 2836-2 movement, which one would you buy?
Those of you in the know should have no problem voicing your opinions. Thanks!
(Edit: More pics of Euromariner are on page 3 of this thread)
WM9

Euromariner (yes you can get it without the engraved rehaut)








