Let's play another game of REP or GEN !!!

[iloveskinny]

Sorry the Seikos are just there to fill the space

 

[zocker4711]

This pic is too bad... You can only speculate

an an sharper pic from frontal would be nice

 

[maxracingshox]

I dare to say the GMTII looks absolutely gen!

 

[iloveskinny]

Sorry for the bad pics sir here are some better ones:

 

[zocker4711]

So the PAM 359 is Rep because they miss the Polished Leveler Pin and the Hands seems not good.
The GMT BLNR is also Rep because the LEC is visible as hell and the White Color on the Ceramic is too clear. The Rehaut of the GEN has much more Shine...
The PAM btw the Noob forgot the Number miss the Polished CP also the Leveler Pin has too much Play you´ll never see that on GEN PAMs.
The Tudor Pelagos has on the Pics very Big Lume Dots what could be an tell of an Fake... But the Teeths of the Bezel are very very nice... So there are two Options...
1. This is an GEN what i believe
2. You had massiv luck on that Rep because the Teeths are very very nice...
The IWC XVI has the Lego Plates on the Dial so it is Rep
And the PAM104 or what it should be i never saw like these... i know only the PAM104 with Silver Hands and not Black... But the CP isn´t Polished on that... And the GENs from this had all Polished CP so this is Rep too...

I must see better Pics from the Tudor but i believe the Tudor Pelagos is GEN all other are Rep...

 

[d4m.test]

First off ain't nothing wrong with a Seiko

I think the Pelagos is gen but it's too damn hard to tell anymore


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[zocker4711]

I must take back my statement!!!

The GMT is the GEN all other Fake... I have Compare with with my GMT and if the light falls different the Bezel seems like white...
But my first impression was right... My Mind said the GMT is the GEN because the Sel are really Perfect and the CP of the Hands are right... The new Rehaut has confuse me...

That´s the Point why i don´t like the new GMTs with the new Matrix Rehaut... There is the Bling Bling missing... It´s not soooooo much as the older Generation...

Ok so... the GMT is GEN and all other are fakes... Also the Pelagos... But Congrats to the Pelagos it seems so that you got one with an really nice Lume and really nice Bezel teeths... But the Lego Lume Dots on the Dial are too fat...
GEN is smaller...

So you have made the right choice Bro !!! Congrats to the GEN GMT BLNR... Would you sell me your BLNR Bezel hahaaaa

 

[JoeyT]

I agree that the batman is the only gen. The Pelagos could also be gen but I'm sticking with GMT

 

[Smoke]

Blnr is 100 percent gen, the Pelagos looks gen aswell.I assume the PAMs are fake .but the seikos are probably real cos I didn't know factorys even rep seikos ?but I have no idea about seiko or pam for that matter

 

[QueTip]

Yup, I agree with the above guys.
GMT is gen, Pelagos should be gen too, might aswell be a real good rep.
I don't know for all the others but those two I think are gen.

 

[SerafinWatch]

I am in too:
Less impressive parts on reps are 1. hands 2. bezel 3. gap between case and ss bracelet.

- Lookong at the hands: Pams and IWC are rep
- Looking at the bezel number cutouts and sel fitment: Tudor also rep, Rolex Gen

 

[Sub007]

GMT definitely GEN, thin GMT hand and bezel (impossible to get as R only trades in bezel for BLNR).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Champagne iH]

I think the date looks a bit to recessed on the Pelagos, but what the hell do I know about Tudor? Not much.


What shall we have? An '82 Margaux! Is it any good? Good....?, It will make you believe in God!

 

[sunny301]

So OP which one is the GEN?

 

[iloveskinny]

I dare to say the GMTII looks absolutely gen!

Yes Sir you are truly amazing! The GMTII is gen indeed!

 

[iloveskinny]

I must take back my statement!!!

The GMT is the GEN all other Fake... I have Compare with with my GMT and if the light falls different the Bezel seems like white...
But my first impression was right... My Mind said the GMT is the GEN because the Sel are really Perfect and the CP of the Hands are right... The new Rehaut has confuse me...

That´s the Point why i don´t like the new GMTs with the new Matrix Rehaut... There is the Bling Bling missing... It´s not soooooo much as the older Generation...

Ok so... the GMT is GEN and all other are fakes... Also the Pelagos... But Congrats to the Pelagos it seems so that you got one with an really nice Lume and really nice Bezel teeths... But the Lego Lume Dots on the Dial are too fat...
GEN is smaller...

So you have made the right choice Bro !!! Congrats to the GEN GMT BLNR... Would you sell me your BLNR Bezel hahaaaa

So close Sir the GMTII is GEN but.... so is the Pelagos! Might have been the lighting but it is indeed a GEN
And thank you for the congrats.....

Since owning the batman for around a month time now, I have to say that Nothing, and I mean nothing, can beat a gen!!!
Especially the bezel, with different lighting and reflection in real life......It is pure porn I must say.....just incredible

Seems like the CP is the dead giveaway for the Pams! Damn! The reps can't fool no one in here!!!

 

[iloveskinny]

Blnr is 100 percent gen, the Pelagos looks gen aswell.I assume the PAMs are fake .but the seikos are probably real cos I didn't know factorys even rep seikos ?but I have no idea about seiko or pam for that matter

Yup, I agree with the above guys.
GMT is gen, Pelagos should be gen too, might aswell be a real good rep.
I don't know for all the others but those two I think are gen.

GMT definitely GEN, thin GMT hand and bezel (impossible to get as R only trades in bezel for BLNR).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Damn! Looks like Noob and KW are not doing good enough! Yes you guys got it so right, the only gens are the GMTII and the Pelagos

 

[iloveskinny]

I am in too:
Less impressive parts on reps are 1. hands 2. bezel 3. gap between case and ss bracelet.

- Lookong at the hands: Pams and IWC are rep
- Looking at the bezel number cutouts and sel fitment: Tudor also rep, Rolex Gen

Yes the hands on the Pams and IWC have little flaws, good eyes sir! Noob and KW need to work harder haha!!

 

[iloveskinny]

So the PAM 359 is Rep because they miss the Polished Leveler Pin and the Hands seems not good.
The GMT BLNR is also Rep because the LEC is visible as hell and the White Color on the Ceramic is too clear. The Rehaut of the GEN has much more Shine...
The PAM btw the Noob forgot the Number miss the Polished CP also the Leveler Pin has too much Play you´ll never see that on GEN PAMs.
The Tudor Pelagos has on the Pics very Big Lume Dots what could be an tell of an Fake... But the Teeths of the Bezel are very very nice... So there are two Options...
1. This is an GEN what i believe
2. You had massiv luck on that Rep because the Teeths are very very nice...
The IWC XVI has the Lego Plates on the Dial so it is Rep
And the PAM104 or what it should be i never saw like these... i know only the PAM104 with Silver Hands and not Black... But the CP isn´t Polished on that... And the GENs from this had all Polished CP so this is Rep too...

I must see better Pics from the Tudor but i believe the Tudor Pelagos is GEN all other are Rep...

Sorry for the bad pics again because the PAM104 does have Silver Hands haha
But the pams are reps anyway

I'm gonna contact TC to order a TC v6 with v2 bezel now, so excited! Should be the best shot I can ever get at the moment right sir?

 

[Smoke]

Damn! Looks like Noob and KW are not doing good enough! Yes you guys got it so right, the only gens are the GMTII and the Pelagos

I've never been wrong so far in 2 years of guess the gens lol