Yuki 16600 case, dial and handset

[Foot Soldier]

http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php?t=202444

Discuss

 

[rsh]

Crown position is very low, crystal height is very low compared to gen, dial has a date window in the wrong position, wrong all around, spend that money on a complete BP sd and you are waaaayyyy better off

 

[KBH]

What's a DJ dial got to to with a Sea Dweller anyway. SD case doesn't show enough to tell anything and the DJ dial is just plain ugly without even looking at the quality.

 

[rsh]

KBH
I am pretty sure that thread here at rwi is just highlighting his new products....here is the actual yuki store link
http://www.yukiwatch.com/catalog/item/6924997/10132798.htm

 

[Ephry73]

Crystal height is bad. Reminds me a bit of the old Silix 16600. Maybe a better crystal and details on the bezel construction would help.

E

 

[Ephry73]

I wonder what the lume is like on the DSSD he offers.

 

[Ruprekt]

Never understood why they can't just be accurate about things? If you're going to copy something why not do it right instead of your version of accurate? Among the other things wrong with that case is the pearl. That's not even close to being correct. If they'd made this for a 2824 and not a 2836 the stem would have been higher and (more) correct. :trainwreck:

 

[Perry]

So wrong everyway you look at it.

 

[BoBaLLoOo]

I wonder what the lume is like on the DSSD he offers.

I've been wondering the same

 

[bc1221]

Never understood why they can't just be accurate about things? If you're going to copy something why not do it right instead of your version of accurate? Among the other things wrong with that case is the pearl. That's not even close to being correct. If they'd made this for a 2824 and not a 2836 the stem would have been higher and (more) correct. :trainwreck:

bc people will buy these and then when they fix one thing on v2 people will buy them again and v3 and so on.

look at some of the watches that are up to like v6,v7
makes you wonder how many of those people own all the previous versions or bought them.

if you were the one making money off these minor mistakes and corrections, would you do it any other way?

 

[mech500]

Is must be a copy of a copy of a copy built using agricultural tolerances.