-
It's our birthday and YOU get the gifts! Eight giveaways including six watches that you can enter for free! RWI Birthday Free Gifts Link
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
***What Audemars Piguet do you have on your wrist today? AP Picture thread***
- Thread starter Jaybo
- Start date
- Status
- 30/9/06
- 11,764
- 1,574
- 113
I hope the date works on yours
sent from my iPad Air
ups....i think i forgot something to set
but to be honest, this RO never can beat a ROO or Diver!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 30/9/06
- 11,764
- 1,574
- 113
I totally agree wigh this statement, a must have watch for the collection, not bad but no flair. Sorry for that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rolexwatchfan
Respected Member
- 17/8/13
- 4,240
- 823
- 113
In my opinion the 15300 is a better RO. I feel the dial of the 15400 is not as nicely balanced as the 15300. I think the dw is too much on the left compared to the 15300.
It looks like the 3120 movement is too small for this piece, this is visible at the caseback.
I love the piece but prefer the 15300. In gen terms im pretty sure the 15300 Will hold a better future value as it sticks more to the original Royal Oak design.
I love the rep, don't get me wrong. I love gen and rep but prefer the 15300. Will be picking up a gen soon. Im wearing the 15400 as im typing
Wow Chris, that comparison pic is crazy. Sizes look so different!
Im not a fan of Royal Oaks, but arent Roos and Divers same.case size at 42mm!?
Diver certainly looks visibly larger in your photo....
Im not a fan of Royal Oaks, but arent Roos and Divers same.case size at 42mm!?
Diver certainly looks visibly larger in your photo....
Really, I don't know why the size look so different at this pic. The case of the Offshore and the Diver are the same, 42mm. Crazy.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- Status