ehhcl3537rwi
Active Member
- 9/7/13
- 211
- 22
- 18
Hmm strange what you say about H&A bull, the diamond I have has the H&A inscribed on the diamond by Ags and from what I can remember the grading for cut on the diamond is 0, I'll dig out the cert and post the diamond stats, interested to know what your thoughts are on it!
And yes meant holloway cut advisor, getting mixed up on Tol ideal cut
Sent from my iPhone 5 Using TapaTalk2 S???R?I?????
If hearts and arrows is inscribed on the girdle almost always it is NOT a proper standard for hearts and arrows I'm afraid. However if its AGS 0000 than you are pretty sure to have a nice bright diamond it just may not have near flawless optical symmetry (not a big deal really we are talking fine nuances)
Without a high standard pretty much any diamond near Tolk proportions can be called H&A without proof (hearts and arrows images) it really doesn't carry any weight. Any dealer can have something inscribed on the girdle and AGS goes along with that game and reports it on the comments. So buyers who aren't aware of this automatically think AGS graded it hearts and arrows when in reality they just printed what was found inscribed on the girdle.
Diamonds are such a slimey business.
I have Garry Holloway the inventor of Holloway Cut Advisor (HCA) on my skype, I find him very opinionated and a bit senile. The HCA is a very blunt tool used to reject diamonds based on averaged measurements, it is good for weeding out good from bad but amongst potentially good ones it is pretty useless in selecting one, the author admits as much himself. Images (Idealscope, Hearts and Arrows, ASET, Photograph) always trump averaged numbers when selecting a diamond. Garry favors shallow combination diamonds and big spreads so his tool is quite a bit biased whereas AGSL is much more balanced in their opinion.