• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

noob and BP sub-c side by side

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
Wep is you bezel real stiff? If so, hold the case with one hand and with the other spin the bezel really fast 30 or 40 turns then recheck it and repeat until it loosens to genlike.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
Look at this from Reg! Damn this one looks markedly better. I wonder if he can source that insert without that hideous watch beneath it?

IMG_2003_zpsa065e79a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
Here's another,,, freaking unbelievable!
IMG_2013_zps8fa7493f.jpg

Have I got to buy yet another watch to have one nice sub-c?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Rudy40

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
6/10/12
9,373
0
0
You need to quit buying watches or you are going chapter eleven! LOL!!
 

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
I've looked at so many I'm nuts,,, those inserts are totally different are they not?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
I've emailed reg and Sead to try figure what factory is producing those watches and how to get that insert as a stand alone part.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

set2374

I'm Pretty Popular
19/7/12
1,714
44
48
Look at this from Reg! Damn this one looks markedly better. I wonder if he can source that insert without that hideous watch beneath it?

IMG_2003_zpsa065e79a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hahahagahs.....that is on fugly looking watch, yet they nailed the bezel insert. Noob, see..,I can be done!!!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

live1

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
25/3/13
3,058
0
0
they just need to fix the 3 now
 

GMTlover

Active Member
27/12/12
300
70
28
Gen:
27E76F43-1893-435A-9D40-99C589E4BD73-21237-000001105F27F1E7_zpsc0adadef.jpg

New bamford Rolex reps:
IMG_2003_zpsa065e79a.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the bamford insert looks like crap.
Look at the 3 at 30. the gen has the line in the middle of the 3 more to the top. On the "bamford insert" the middle line is in the middle of the 3 or say centered.;-)
The font is also thicker on gen.
Then the markers around the 10. on the gen they are very close to the 10, on the "bamford insert" there are a mile away.

I would say the font numbering on the BP is closest. maybe triangle and pearl can be better but the numbering thickness is perfect.
 

GMTlover

Active Member
27/12/12
300
70
28
Here a picture to add.
There also is a problem with the 20;-)
the spacing between the 2 and 0 is of on the bamford
 

mitchbaria

Respected Member
15/10/12
3,453
109
0
Not so much my point of how wonderful the font or depth of the number of these are but rather the triangle and pearl which seems to escape both Bp and noob!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

wepiii

Active Member
18/12/12
459
0
0
I'm pretty happy with the noob pearl. It's a little off from gen but pretty close in my opinion
 

Rudy40

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
6/10/12
9,373
0
0
This is one of the best looking ones i have seen so far! Still not there but close!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/BLACK-CERAM...Accessories_SpareParts_SM&hash=item27d5c80d46

Here's WSO!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/BEZEL-INSER...154?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item483f9c15f2

Then these numbers look like they are painted on!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Black-Ceram...143?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item27d689a3d7

I guess the only sullution will be taking a pearl off one insert and putting on a better insert with deeper engraving on the numbers!
Mitch is on a mission! And i think he will not stop until he finds it! Hopefully i will be there when he does!LOL!!
 

wepiii

Active Member
18/12/12
459
0
0
Honestly none of those triangles look right to me. I still think the BP engravings are the closest, but apparently Mitch said the angle of the bezel itself is all wrong