Does this Sub look gen?

[Curt941]

 

[TastyTreats]

What is with the numbers on the bezel ? 20 & 50 same but different to 10 & 30 & 40 ?

Is this the photo or is it like this in person ?

 

[rsh]

It looks gen but I think it is rep. Looks like a noob dial actually

 

[Omega_dude]

I don't see a rehaut and the number on the bezel look a little wonky. But other than that it's a good rep.

 

[Omega_dude]

I don't see a rehaut and the number on the bezel look a little wonky. But other than that it's a good rep.

 

[Chris v.]

Looks gen to me, maybe a Tc sub


Sent from my IPhone 4

 

[Curt941]

Some guy posted it on a non watch forum. Said it was his buddies and he had had it for a while. I'm thinking gen because the pearl looks good and the SEL fit looks great to me.

 

[maleth]

Looks Tc to me...

 

[believer123]

It "looks" GEN to me.

 

[giobo]

Gen 2003 range

Sent from my Nexus HD2 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Kpalooza]

What is with the numbers on the bezel ? 20 & 50 same but different to 10 & 30 & 40 ?

Is this the photo or is it like this in person ?

I think it's the light hitting the numbers making them seem brighter and larger.

 

[User_Error]

looks gen to me...pearl is good, cg's are good, rehaut is nice and sel's are tight.

 

[SecretAgentMan]

If its the light changing the numbers, then I suppose it could be gen. That bezel insert is the only thing I see wrong with the numbers, light pending of course.

 

[PamLuver80]

Def gen.

 

[Curt941]

So someone on the forum brought up that the CG's looked to short. But to me I think it's just a bad angle.

 

[greg325i]

It looks gen but I think it is rep. Looks like a noob dial actually

I don't think it's a Noob dial, based on (ironically) what I just posted here:
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/dial-ticks-both-105580?p=1033048

I'd guess:
(1) it's a Gen Z- or M-serial, or
(2) perhaps it's a WM9 or TC dial.

...but I don't think it's a noob. I readily admit there may be other tells that I'm missing that you're familiar with.

 

[sneed12?]

Picture is a bit out of focus, but it looks gen.

 

[Chris v.]

Anymore pics of it? I believe it's gen but it could be a Franken or genstein. There is not any real way to determine what's under the dial, and I have seen gensteins that were all gen but movement and DWO make it difficult now to know if it's a gen movement inside.


Sent from my IPhone 4

 

[PamLuver80]

I don't think it's a Noob dial, based on (ironically) what I just posted here:
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/dial-ticks-both-105580?p=1033048

I'd guess:
(1) it's a Gen Z- or M-serial, or
(2) perhaps it's a WM9 or TC dial.

...but I don't think it's a noob. I readily admit there may be other tells that I'm missing that you're familiar with.

Cant be an M series or a LATE z series because both of those have RRH engravings.

My guest would be a gen Y, F, D serial.

 

[greg325i]

Cant be an M series or a LATE z series because both of those have RRH engravings.

My guest would be a gen Y, F, D serial.

RRH? Are you referring to the rehaut engravings? Never heard that term before...