JF 16610LV - QC Pictures

[wNe]

Hey guys,

received the QC Pictures for my base Franken 16610LV from JF (No Rehaut).
But I dont like the CGs? Seems like the lower Crownguard is thinner than the top one?

Or Im wrong?

Pictures: https://imgur.com/a/uoclxFv

What do you think ? Skip and get another QC?

 

[Maron]

Hey guys,

received the QC Pictures for my base Franken 16610LV from JF (No Rehaut).
But I dont like the CGs? Seems like the lower Crownguard is thinner than the top one?

Or Im wrong?

Pictures: https://imgur.com/a/uoclxFv

What do you think ? Skip and get another QC?

Looks that way but you won’t know for sure unless you ask them, and request a better picture of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[andyc]

I wouldn't accept that watch.

 

[Maron]

I just looked on my computer and I agree that the crown guards are F**ked. also, look at the date position.

PASS

 

[KJ2020]

To me, they are noticeably different widths in every pic they are visible. Reject.

 

[wNe]

These are the new QC Pictures.. but again.. looks like the first watch.
Check Crown Guards please.. one is thinner again.. date not alligned aswell, but easy fix.

But the CGs are really bad or isnt it?

https://imgur.com/a/GK9uhrV

I dont know whats wrong with the JF 16610LVs they receive.. again rejected.

 

[Tobel]

Yep the lower CG is just smaller than the other, particularly visible on the 4th picture. What does your TD say ?

 

[alessandri]

Is this common on the JF case now?

This is the first time I have seen or heard of this.

 

[wNe]

No answer yet. But I dont accept that.
Ordered from Puretime. But if the next fails I will cancel it. The watch on their website got perfect CGs. This is now the 3rd.
(First you see in the 1. topic, 2nd was defect, 3rd is this now)

Will cancel the whole order now and ordered from another TD. Dont know whats wrong .. but the fact is, that they send me 3 faulty watches via QC.