- 16/8/18
- 692
- 355
- 63
Thank you for sharing this video. I’ve been waiting to see a side by side comparison.
imo solely off of looks the PPF v3 is the better choice on and off wrist due to the fact that :
1. Links are not oversized
2. Movement is engraved
3. On the wrist the protruding crown is negligible
Yes, The dial on the 3k looks incredible and so does the crown, but the large links are way more noticeable than the PPFs protruding crown.
On the other hand the 3k’s clone movement is definitely a huge step, but the watch hasn’t been out long enough to confirm the reliability of the movement.
Furthermore, having a clone movement that isn’t engraved, defeats the whole purpose to me.
If 3k engraves the movement and adjusts the shape of the links on the next version, then PPF might have something to worry about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First link better on PPF, no way a deal breaker compared to the terrible crown and CG of the PPF
Would anyone change their opinion if the comparison was between 3K and a PF/PPF Hybrid (PF Case+Bracelet and PPF Dial+Hands)?
I am still not convinced that the 3K is "better". Blue is a tough one, the gen blue produces infinite shades depending on lighting and angle. Also to my eyes, the lume color on hands+marker seem better on the PPF (slightly greyish compared to the whiter shade on 3k)
Yes, The dial on the 3k looks incredible and so does the crown, but the large links are way more noticeable than the PPFs protruding crown.
actually went back to Patek website last night and the crown at least on the gold version of this watch doesnt look that different from the PPF one. Its certainly not as spiky as the one on the 3KF version (at least not from the 360 video on their website).
Will pf or ppf bracelet fit 3kf?