First sorry i write these review thinking in spanish and after translate to english.
The first time i see these watch i fall in love
These watch i see in the Chopard boutiques of BKK and Kuala Lumpur
Here is the chopard boutiques from Kuala Lumpur just in the shopping center located in the petonas tower.
Before buy a rep today i analise too much. I´m a little bored of buy bad reps (like Anonimo Milimetri). I see and compare with the original and see that there isn´t big flaws. Now i have in mine house i see that is very well made, and i think that the flaws are minimal.
Maybe the worst is the PVD treatment. I don´t know if is PVD or is painted. I think is painted, because is bright. And it remember to Chanel J12 non ceramic. These maybe is a big problem. I need time to speak about the durability of PVD.
The strap as always is a chinese plastic shit. Here in Spain we have someone that make strap to order, and i send the strap for get one of good leather.
THE REP
First look show that we have a good rep. The weight is good. The AR is more or less good (worst than HBB or Breitling Steelfish). The mov an asian 28000 (if you look there is a lot of new reps that use the old asian 7750). Saphire. The cronw you cannot screw, but you haven´t the feel of fragility of others cronws.
Here a wrist shot
These ones i use the camera flas, and i see that get more or less good result.
The gen
Compare
Here a litle of photos.. The photo was take in diferent angle, and after i need to adjust the size.
100 % gen
80%
60%
20%
When i compare, i only found the typical error in the date wheel, and in the lenght of Chopard (the gen is a little more short).
And last a black and white photos.
Thanks for read. And like always sorry for mine english.
The first time i see these watch i fall in love
These watch i see in the Chopard boutiques of BKK and Kuala Lumpur
Here is the chopard boutiques from Kuala Lumpur just in the shopping center located in the petonas tower.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35e54/35e54dd03cd19463ce6fcabfd41c0e4a6f70fc7c" alt="IMG_0379-1.jpg"
Before buy a rep today i analise too much. I´m a little bored of buy bad reps (like Anonimo Milimetri). I see and compare with the original and see that there isn´t big flaws. Now i have in mine house i see that is very well made, and i think that the flaws are minimal.
Maybe the worst is the PVD treatment. I don´t know if is PVD or is painted. I think is painted, because is bright. And it remember to Chanel J12 non ceramic. These maybe is a big problem. I need time to speak about the durability of PVD.
The strap as always is a chinese plastic shit. Here in Spain we have someone that make strap to order, and i send the strap for get one of good leather.
THE REP
First look show that we have a good rep. The weight is good. The AR is more or less good (worst than HBB or Breitling Steelfish). The mov an asian 28000 (if you look there is a lot of new reps that use the old asian 7750). Saphire. The cronw you cannot screw, but you haven´t the feel of fragility of others cronws.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6edfc/6edfc23682a0aa62401b488378646e77ba415eee" alt="PC190019.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f69f/9f69fae82ad46d4f1d35ef246768d20000607519" alt="PC190025.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96ba9/96ba94a73690f988d123ebb321fd46016ceb8803" alt="PC190022.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efe24/efe244ee521d2afd71e858a90119279ecbc3603a" alt="PC190024.jpg"
Here a wrist shot
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb1f9/eb1f949fe7c7080218fcdd76ba50047c03e9aed0" alt="PC190045.jpg"
These ones i use the camera flas, and i see that get more or less good result.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5613/a56138dd61c8b153df88c64b076ee0ca912b088e" alt="PC190063.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fad0/2fad0902110a52a2370036ae396a96d93d7d2ad4" alt="PC190049.jpg"
The gen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57115/5711567fb7bb00404c631c61bdbd3e94d4ff530d" alt="chopard3copia.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ff9e/1ff9e2209fcfdd1d09447564b771e2689c40816d" alt="chopard4copia.jpg"
Compare
Here a litle of photos.. The photo was take in diferent angle, and after i need to adjust the size.
100 % gen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f945/5f9451cbd4b82a945a95538f3fca4013cced1ce9" alt="Original.jpg"
80%
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/553d0/553d0868f98a16e47436757a9bcdcbddbdff726d" alt="80.jpg"
60%
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c720d/c720d9dc188c91db1fd467e800752258fdfa6507" alt="60.jpg"
20%
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/523a2/523a27d5a8c30461e5ea98483c1693ffb86f3cab" alt="20.jpg"
When i compare, i only found the typical error in the date wheel, and in the lenght of Chopard (the gen is a little more short).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3568/f356819277172c02b551a11f4783af9901b5cb72" alt="Comparacincopia.jpg"
And last a black and white photos.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c0b3/8c0b30c594d33e0eec5b12050842573ca4873acf" alt="PC190039.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d4e9/7d4e96de1151a93daa0fb9be36301b0ab0102a11" alt="PC190031.jpg"
Thanks for read. And like always sorry for mine english.