Just because it's not the same colour doesn't mean it's swiss. The rep makes will use whichever movements they can get their hands on at the time. It's a good chance that the dealer shots are from a final prototype or early release from the factory.
For what it's worth yours does look pretty much like a gen ETA movement. But it looks like a 2836 rather than a 2824.
Surely here the issue is trade description.
If you are sold one thing and get something else and inferior, that is not good.
The suspicion is that dealers are more tempted to do this when the issue only gets discovered if the watch is opened.
Was this one drop-shipped, and what was the dealer's reaction when told about the issue?
It's true ETA, but let me ask you this: would you buy a Hublot v5 with stickered rotor or v6 with engraved rotor?
I guess you would go for the v6. But if you ordered a v6 and get a v5 rotor, what'll be your reaction? The movement was advertised as nickel plated engraved, and IMO it also makes that version the Ultimate version.
Yes but the Hublot has an display caseback where being able to see the rotor is a big deal. This has a close caseback where absolutely no one buy yourself is going to see it. Any sort of rotor decoration is purely incidental.
I wouldn't have bothered all the hassle of returning this watch just for a different rotor on it. Especially considering it's pretty much a verified ETA movement.
Did you get a replacement Santos yet lantis?
Looking on some of the dealers sites, they seem to have many different versions of the Santos/Ballon Bleu and charge a premium for a decorated rotor so I can see why you got annoyed over this.
What I would like to see is what the movement looks like from a genuine Cartier Santos/Ballon Bleu so I can compare the differences to the rep to see if it's worth paying extra.
Anyone know where I can find this?
Thanks!
No I didn't ask for a replacement, I asked for a refund.
The backstory I revealed in my review of the dealer in RWG opcorn: