Originally posted by fatarms
View Post
I don't claim to be an optics expert by any means. I would not think that there should be any issue with the black hole effect, in fact, it may enhance it a tiny bit. Here's why:
An anti-reflective coating is meant to do exactly what it sounds like, diminish the reflection of light from a surface. Depending on the thickness of the coating, it can reduce this to near zero reflection from most viewing angles of the surface.
Sapphire crystals, being clear, actually have two reflective surfaces - the top and bottom of the crystal both will act as reflecting surfaces to any light that enters the crystal from the outside. So with no AR, light entering the crystal is actually reflected to your eyes from both surfaces. Single layer AR on the outside is the more effective of the two, but is prone to scratching. Some watches do it to the inside of the crystal to prevent the scratching on the outside. Therefore, you still get the reflection from the outside which will be a little more than from the inside of an uncoated crystal. The AR on the inside will diminish the reflection of incoming light from the outside world, as well as from the dial if it is polished. One thing to keep in mind here is that since the crystal is clear, the coating on the inside will also diminish the reflection of the incoming light from reflecting back to your eyes from the underside, but will do nothing to the external uncoated surface. This is why it looks a little better on your PAMs, but the light reflecting from the outside of the crystal is going to cause most of the glare you still see.
As for a true black hole crystal, the AR is applied to the outside of the crystal, but only underneath the cyclops itself. So light passing through the cyclops will actually be passing through two layers of AR (outside and inside) and therefore possibly enhance the black hole effect a slight degree more than the 116610 crystals which only have the AR on the outside under the cyclops.
Sent from the RWI App
Comment