Just wanted to bring everyone up to speed on my springbar search. The 1.5mm x 0.9 pivot springbars did not work, they were entirely too thin. It turns out the GMF 116710 BLNR case accepts 1.2mm pivots and I believe those dimensions are not to gen-spec for the 116710. The larger pivot dimensions on the case match the dimension of the 126710 jubilee bracelet. From what I can find on rolexforums, a gen Rolex 116610 (submariner) actually uses a 2.0mm bar x 1.2mm pivot springbar like the one GMF is using in the oyster strap.
Odd, though, as Everest lists one set of "modern rolex style springbars" that are 2.0mm bar x 0.9mm pivot and ssays these work in "Rolex Submariner, Explorer, GMT, and other fine Rolex sports watches." So Everest seems to be suggesting the GMT and Submariner pivots match in diameter, while research shows otherwise. Why is this so complicated! Unfortunately it makes things difficult for those looking to replace their springbars with a set from everest, as the gen GMT springbar will not fit well in the GMF case.
Anyway, this whole GMF "issue" actually makes things simpler for those wanting to try the jubilee from GMF on their 116710 BLNR, as I just used a gen-like Everest 126710 springbars in the GMF jubilee and it snaps right in place. It mucks things up a bit if anyone tries using a different factory bracelet on the GMF case as you'll be needing to find a set of springbars that match the bracelet diameter, (probably 2.0mm) and have 1.2mm pins. So, if you have GMF, it's best you stick with GMF bracelets.
Here's the comparison chart:
| Width | Bar | Pin |
GEN 116710 (oyster) GMT bracelet | 20.0mm | 2.0mm | 0.9mm |
GMF 116710 (oyster) GMT bracelet | 20.0mm | 2.0mm | 1.2mm |
GEN 116610 (oyster) Submariner bracelet | 20.0mm | 2.0mm | 1.2mm |
GEN 126710 (jubilee) GMT bracelet | 20.0mm | 1.5mm | 1.2mm |
GMF 126710 (jubilee) GMT bracelet | 20.0mm | 1.5mm | 1.2mm |