Which is best rolex replica 2020?

[alnitak11]

"Sea-Dweller 2017 Baselworld 126600 ARF 1:1 Best Edition 904L SS Case and Bracelet A2824 V3, out of the box perfect"

Great Rep! But could be a bit heavy on a woman's wrist. Take a look also to the new Sub 116610 ARF V3 SH3135. Seems to be really close to the ZZF V2 with a really better replicated bracelet

 

[michaelle1193]

they will be large to you if you found sub large

Honestly I have tried GMT black and sub. And I found out that the sub is bigger than the GMT.The Submariner, on the flipside, was thicker and came with a larger crown. even they are both 40mm. Hopefully I’m wrong

 

[michaelle1193]

Just to follow chocman02 post, I'd go ( I have it too, to be honest and really love it) for an: ARF 39 Oyster Perpetual, don't mind the dial colour, it's up to your preferencies. STRICTLY to purchase by a Trusted Dealers. About DJ 41, also ARF could be the best choice. Take notice that TD have very few items with Oyster bracalet in this model. Most of them are available with Jubilee. About GMT, my personal advise is to wait. May be Factories will release better and more reliability movements in next future, Ciao!

How about GMT in black??? If not I might go for DJ

 

[alnitak11]

How about GMT in black??? If not I might go for DJ

I do not have a GMT so I prefer to not suggest this or that. Of course, the black one is the most accurate in bezel, just because the black colour is almost "neutral" and much more accurate when replicated on a bezel. I've followed several discussions about GMT and my personal opinion is to avoid them at present time, due to many problems reported by owners concerning the movement. If I were in you, i'd go for a less complicated movement model, like OP or DJ. ARF would be my choice.

 

[michaelle1193]

I do not have a GMT so I prefer to not suggest this or that. Of course, the black one is the most accurate in bezel, just because the black colour is almost "neutral" and much more accurate when replicated on a bezel. I've followed several discussions about GMT and my personal opinion is to avoid them at present time, due to many problems reported by owners concerning the movement. If I were in you, i'd go for a less complicated movement model, like OP or DJ. ARF would be my choice.

Thanks. I’m thinking of buying DJ 41. I have tried the sub and The Submariner, on the flipside, was thicker and came with a larger crown even they are both 40mm. But the size of GMT is perfect for me cause I have small wrist. What do u think?

 

[alnitak11]

Thanks. I’m thinking of buying DJ 41. I have tried the sub and The Submariner, on the flipside, was thicker and came with a larger crown even they are both 40mm. But the size of GMT is perfect for me cause I have small wrist. What do u think?

Hmmmm... I've Gen GMT2 and Rep Submariner 116610 and ,at my personal advice, they're not different in portability at wrist but, as the great Mohammed Ali said : " Don't count the days, make the days count!" So, if you like GMT, go for it! Personally I love the way ARF make their Rep but would be better to ask, in Forum, to someone who owns a GMT just to get better feedbacks! Wish you a great time with your next Rep!

 

[alnitak11]

Hmmmm... I've Gen GMT2 and Rep Submariner 116610 and ,at my personal advice, they're not different in portability at wrist but, as the great Mohammed Ali said : " Don't count the days, make the days count!" So, if you like GMT, go for it! Personally I love the way ARF make their Rep but would be better to ask, in Forum, to someone who owns a GMT just to get better feedbacks! Wish you a great time with your next Rep!

PS in my previous post I've typed to not have a GMT. I missed to write a REP one. But in a 1:1 Rep dimensions "SHOULD" be the same, so keep my advice as good

 

[waterproofpt]

Another thought ..... A Sub 16610 (vs the 116610) fits smaller due to a slight difference in case and lug shape.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[michaelle1193]

Another thought ..... A Sub 16610 (vs the 116610) fits smaller due to a slight difference in case and lug shape.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean the model 116610 is fit smaller? Good to know. The one I have tried before was quite thick for my wrist.

 

[aristole]

You mean the model 116610 is fit smaller? Good to know. The one I have tried before was quite thick for my wrist.

Go with Explorer BP 39mm, fantastic watch

 

[Alephpark]

ZZF 116610 V2 with VR3135 movement

 

[cixbuka]

Everyone is a bit rude when people ask this but the volume of material on the site can be daunting to go through.
the short answers are:

Sub no date - zzf v2
Sub date - zzf v2
hulk - zzf v2
Daytona - noob v3 a4130
Datejust 41 or 36 - arf v3
Gmt master - arf sh3186 chs
Explorer 1 - bp head wuth arf bracelet
Seadweller - ARF

how about yachtmaster??

 

[shortlegs]

Wow. Anyone else totally amazed that this thread is now at 3 pages?

 

[michaelle1193]

Wow. Anyone else totally amazed that this thread is now at 3 pages?

Surprise

 

[anh]

To me the sub is like 40,5mm, and some parts are thicker. If it’s big for your wrist then go for Explorer or DJ 36mm

 

[sfgerl]

You mean the model 116610 is fit smaller? Good to know. The one I have tried before was quite thick for my wrist.

No - the 16610 (also known as the 5 digit sub for obvious reasons) feels and wears smaller overall than the 116610 subs. Even though they both use a 40 mm. case, the 16610 really wears smaller on the wrist. I am a woman and love the look of the 5 digit sub on my wrist. Downside to the 5 digit is that the bezel is metal, not ceramic as in the 116610 models, and scratches more easily.

Check out this on youtube (it is a comparison of gen Rolex 16610 vs. 116610 watches, but the reps are going to be the same):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0quLfeuVPp0

 

[waterproofpt]

No - the 16610 (also known as the 5 digit sub for obvious reasons) feels and wears smaller overall than the 116610 subs. Even though they both use a 40 mm. case, the 16610 really wears smaller on the wrist. I am a woman and love the look of the 5 digit sub on my wrist. Downside to the 5 digit is that the bezel is metal, not ceramic as in the 116610 models, and scratches more easily.

Check out this on youtube (it is a comparison of gen Rolex 16610 vs. 116610 watches, but the reps are going to be the same):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0quLfeuVPp0

Thanks sfgerl for clearing that up for the OP. You answered it better than I would have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[waterproofpt]

No - the 16610 (also known as the 5 digit sub for obvious reasons) feels and wears smaller overall than the 116610 subs. Even though they both use a 40 mm. case, the 16610 really wears smaller on the wrist. I am a woman and love the look of the 5 digit sub on my wrist. Downside to the 5 digit is that the bezel is metal, not ceramic as in the 116610 models, and scratches more easily.

Check out this on youtube (it is a comparison of gen Rolex 16610 vs. 116610 watches, but the reps are going to be the same):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0quLfeuVPp0

Thanks sfgerl for clearing that up for the OP. You answered it better than I would have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[stufuse]

Everyone is a bit rude when people ask this but the volume of material on the site can be daunting to go through.
the short answers are:

Sub no date - zzf v2
Sub date - zzf v2
hulk - zzf v2
Daytona - noob v3 a4130
Datejust 41 or 36 - arf v3
Gmt master - arf sh3186 chs
Explorer 1 - bp head wuth arf bracelet
Seadweller - ARF

In your opinion. OP needs to READ and make up his own mind, he might enjoy it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mask415]

Just ordered a Submariner 116610 LN ARF SH3135 V3 from puretime so will see how close this is to the real thing.