ZZF Ref 114060 V2 vs Gen honset review

Therion666 · 8/12/19

stufuse said:
Easy to know if you get v1, dial with indentation, terrible rehaut and decoration to look like 3130 movement

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

May I post QC pic of the rehaut to confirm if it's a V2?

Therion666 · 9/12/19

So, can you guys confirm that this one has V2 updates? The rehaut is aligned at 12,but I'm not sure about the rest. It looks completely off at the bottom part of the dial, between 3 and 9 o'clock. How about the markers? SEL seems to be fine, no recess, but that's how it is I suppose..

stufuse KJ2020 botsyboy k4jun

Lariram · 9/12/19

Look at pic #1 second is at zero but look at where minute hand is. I don’t see anything else wrong.

Therion666 · 9/12/19

The letters on the rehaut should be exactly where the minute markers are and they're completely off across most of the dial. I've spent quite some time this night studying pics of other subs and this is not how it's supposed to be..

stufuse · 9/12/19

Therion666 said:
The letters on the rehaut should be exactly where the minute markers are and they're completely off across most of the dial. I've spent quite some time this night studying pics of other subs and this is not how it's supposed to be..

This is how the zzf is mate, they only improved the engraving, if you want a better alignment then you should change factory for a noob.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

k4jun · 9/12/19

Therion666 said:
So, can you guys confirm that this one has V2 updates? The rehaut is aligned at 12,but I'm not sure about the rest. It looks completely off at the bottom part of the dial, between 3 and 9 o'clock. How about the markers? SEL seems to be fine, no recess, but that's how it is I suppose..

stufuse KJ2020 botsyboy k4jun

The same watch was posted here
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...leasing/page71

Dial markers look nowehere close to what we've seen on zzf 116610, prob I would ask for a photo of clasp code.
If it says C4R then 114060 dial is not the same quality as the date dial, or dealer has just mistaken the watches.

Therion666 · 9/12/19

Thank you for your replies, I appreciate it!

xartan · 9/12/19

Thanks for the review.

If you wanna nitpick I gotta say I think the clasp does not look like the gen to me. The edges are sharp and too closely fit. The coronet doesn't look like the gen to me either. And those SELs are just hard to get right for any rep. This one included.

It's a good rep. Overall I think I like the noob 114060 more, though.

shortlegs · 9/12/19

Therion666 Not sure of this is indeed a ZZF, somehow it doesn't look quite like one. If their sub date is anything to go by,

1. The ZZF rehaut alignment isn't fantastic, but mine is nowhere near as bad as this. For this piece, the alignment gets progressively worse as you move round the dial. ZZF ones aren't this poor.

2. The bezel insert. The spacing between the triangle and the edge of the insert seems a little wide, at least compared to the photos on the ZZF sub date V2.

3. The 3, 6 and 9 markers look like they have sharp corners, although I can't be sure from the resolution of the photos.

Therion666 · 9/12/19

Yeah, it seemed kinda weird to me too, it must be a Friday afternoon shift unit

tumad · 10/12/19

P.s. The movement of this post:

drdds · 10/12/19

tumad said:
P.s. The movement of this post:

let's say if the rehuat is misaligned, can we shift the dial by a tiny little without changing the stem too much?

tumad · 11/12/19

drdds said:
let's say if the rehuat is misaligned, can we shift the dial by a tiny little without changing the stem too much?

Might be possible

tumad · 12/12/19

Update:
It seems this movement is pretty much garbage. Stopped working 2 weeks in. Bridge holding the escapement wheel is misaligned causing binding at random. But yeah, that's a rep for ya....

GrandmasterChime · 12/12/19

tumad said:
Update:
It seems this movement is pretty much garbage. Stopped working 2 weeks in. Bridge holding the escapement wheel is misaligned causing binding at random. But yeah, that's a rep for ya....

That's interesting because I was mighty disappointed when I discovered my v10 had the sa3135 and not the vr3135 like this one. But it hasnt missed a beat and is so far keeping perfect time -3 secs. I guess you never know

Therion666 · 12/12/19

Bigpoppad said:
That's interesting because I was mighty disappointed when I discovered my v10 had the sa3135 and not the vr3135 like this one. But it hasnt missed a beat and is so far keeping perfect time -3 secs. I guess you never know

Why would you be disappointed? Noob always uses the SA, it's their movement and it's specified on every single TD's website. SA is alright. Until it's not. I had 2 and they both crapped out.

GrandmasterChime · 12/12/19

Therion666 said:
Why would you be disappointed? Noob always uses the SA, it's their movement and it's specified on every single TD's website. SA is alright. Until it's not. I had 2 and they both crapped out.

Because they were using the vr and some tds were showing a different movement

Therion666 · 12/12/19

I've never heard about Noob using the VR.. But then again my hearing is not what it used to be, I'm getting old

martinpaynebfc · 12/12/19

I thought there was a thread stating that SA3135 is dead and noob swapped to VR3135?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

botsyboy · 12/12/19

A few V10 had the VR inside but it didn’t last long.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

ZZF Ref 114060 V2 vs Gen honset review

Put Some Respect On My Name

Put Some Respect On My Name

Renowned Member

Put Some Respect On My Name

Put Some Respect On My Name

Ω Section Moderator

Put Some Respect On My Name

I'm Pretty Popular

Active Member

Put Some Respect On My Name

Known Member

You're Saying I Can Sell?

Known Member

Known Member

Agent Provocateur

Put Some Respect On My Name

Agent Provocateur

Put Some Respect On My Name

You're Saying I Can Sell?

Put Some Respect On My Name