Here's a pic of my gen on top, the linked watch on the bottom.
The linked watch is a gen. There are some things about it that are a little different from mine but mine is an older model. Dials can vary a bit from one production run to another, same with inserts.
But I have seen the best the rep world can do with a 5 digit rep and the linked watch beats them all by too wide a margin to be a rep.
The hand stack is correct. Only two rep movements do that. The 2824 timebomb, which has a quite noticeable lower crown height, and the new DG3804 which has a huge GMT hand hole surround, so large it completely conceals the hour hand hole surround. This alone is enough proof to convince me its not a rep, but there's much more.
The insert fonts are gen. I own at least 20 aluminum inserts and hunt for them several times a week. NOBODY can rep an insert like the one linked.
The dial markers are rounded, zoom in close to see. The dial fonts are correct. The case shape, the CGs, the crown position, all good. The clasp logo, the bracelet, compare the bezel teeth to mine. I don't see a thing out of place. The minute tics aren't touching the rehaut which is uncommon but I've seen it before on gens. Here's a different gen to compare.
Like others have said, IMO no transaction involving a Rolex of this value should occur outside of an AD in front of their watchsmith. Pay them if need be. My AD watchsmith has looked at watches for me without charge. As sure as I am about a watch, I wouldn't do it any other way.
There are a lot more pics to look at in my gen vs rep review if you want to see more
https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...bp-factory-rolex-16710-gmt-full-review-vs-gen