116520/116500 dial aftermarket

[italym21]

[h=2]Hi guys[/h] what do you think about this?

 

[M Scott]

Incorrect 116520 ROLEX fonts on 116500 dials...

https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...b-v3-daytona-vs-gen-daytona-vs-arf-v2-daytona

 

[tmp2018]

overall they are pretty good, but another flaw is the "ROLEX": its too thin...the "ROLEX" is never thinner than the "OYSTER PERPETUAL". there are a few other small flaws, but...

 

[philwongnz]

For a start the subdial numbers doesn't sit at the middle for the Panda. I can't see clearly but Daytona is in serif. It looks like a noob dial TBH

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

 

[italym21]

Incorrect 116520 ROLEX fonts on 116500 dials...

https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...b-v3-daytona-vs-gen-daytona-vs-arf-v2-daytona

thank you! for your impressions there are better this or ARF V2?

 

[M Scott]

thank you! for your impressions there are better this or ARF V2?

ARF is much better.

 

[italym21]

ARF is much better.

thank you...

i'm in research of an soluction for heavy brightness of chrono on the arf dial v2 black... if i don't found it, i change from 116520 black to 116500 white.