{{ NOOB V3 Daytona vs Gen Daytona vs ARF V2 Daytona }}

[xxBlack]

Noob V3 pictures...
.
.

.

Thx for using my pics if you want more I can send you some.


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

 

[M Scott]

Thx for using my pics if you want more I can send you some.

Thanks for your offer.

I just like to group good, high resolution pictures together showing details in different lighting.

 

[Daniele88Roma]

Good work, thanks for your contribution.

 

[M Scott]

Noob V3 Black Dial Pictures...
.

.

.

.

 

[Scoobiedooo]

Very informative, thank you.

 

[owk]

Great work, thanks for the share and efford you put in this.

 

[Spatiumtemporis]

Thanks a lot M Scott. Shit now I can't unsee the thicker chrono circles on the black dial. Just order a black dial 116500 v3. I won't change for the panda one however cause it think the thickness diff will be barely visible on the wrist.

​​

 

[LaraA]

Thanks a lot for this great write up

 

[Uhr70]

M Scott thank you for your efforts, very informative post :drinks_cheers:

 

[VaderTime]

thank you M Scott for your great effort and knowledge! This is very informative and precise!

Btw, ARF bracelet will be a better choice for the noob v3 (kinda like putting an ARF bracelet on a noob sub)?

 

[M Scott]

The following quote was taken from a thread started by old_man

These pictures and the descriptions do an outstanding job of more clearly showing the detail differences between an ARF and a Noob dial.
I am adding it to this comparison thread to try and consolidate more information showing the ARF and Noob Daytona differences.

Back in August I made this post inquiring our fellow RWI members their insights on whether the ARF has a superior dial than the Noob, and whether the difference is noticeable.

https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...a-c-white-dial

The response I got was…well not much. I guess not that many members bought the same watch from both factories (I mean, why would you?), and the few valuable insights that I received from M Scott , was that up until this point on this great forum, this is a point of debate, and you have to decide whether it’s worth the investment.

And so I did. I went ahead and sourced both ARF and Noob white dial 116500, and I’m here to make a report, and in a humble attempt, to clear things up for fellow forum members.

Let me begin by saying that when you see the two dials (watches) side-by-side in the metal, you can tell right away, without even going into detail that the ARF is the higher quality dial that conveyed that “gen aura”.

However, not all the difference can be captured by the camera, because it’s not just simply about “dimensions, and distances and fonts”, but also the shape and the way it reflects light, which the naked human eye catches very well and the camera cannot (maybe you can prove me wrong with stellar equipment and mastery in photography, which I clearly am not).

So aside from macro shots to illustrate the point, for some assessments I’ll share what I see with my naked eye. And rightfully so because at the end of the day is the perception received by the naked eye into the brain that brings the ultimate pleasure in owning these watches. And below are the reasons I think that I do have an adequate pair of eyes for this purpose:

1. I own a few gen Rolex for a few years now and have developed (or always had) the habit of gazing upon my wrist and appreciating the details; I’m well sensitized towards the minor design details, shapes and polishing nuance of the gen Rolex, and what makes them gen;
2. I also happen to own a few Grand Seiko (SBGW253, SBGR095, SBGW049), and if you know your GS, you definitely can appreciate what polishing can do to the quality of the watch;
3. I’ve been in the rep game for a long time now to know that NOT ALL DETAILS MATTER in a rep, only what we see and perceive with our naked eye; that “gen feel” comes from the minor details in the shape & polishing etc. that conveys quality to our eyes & brain, and sometimes the conscious part of ourselves find it hard to describe with words; IMHO the fact that a letter or word positioning is off by a couple of micrometers does NOTHING to how “gen-like” the watch feels in real life.

For those who don’t have the patience to go through the entire post, I’ll start with a summary of the key differences between the ARF dial and the Noob dial:

1. The coronet @ 12 on the ARF dial is much more finely made, and the shape is more accurate to gen;
2. The DAYTONA letter font on the ARF is more accurate and the color is a darker shade of red like gen;
3. The printing on the subdial is much more crisp and clear on the ARF dial;
4. The 5-liner dial printing on the ARF is clearly crisper and more defined, with nice “blood-drop” print height (vs. noob dial’s murky dial print);
5. The minute track on the ARF is in a finer print just like the gen (vs. Noob’s relatively bold and murky print);
6. The subdial height on the ARF is a bit higher on the ARF dial like gen;
7. The general polishing of the ARF hour markers are much nicer than the noob, they seem to be shinier and reflects light in a beautiful way that dulls the noob dial (this was hard to capture with camera, as with all polished surfaces);
8. The color of the ARF dial is slightly warmer than the pale-white noob dial color;

These seemingly subtle details actually amounts to a very obvious result, and visual center of the brain (at least my brain) picks them up as hints of quality without consciously recognizing it. In direct comparison of the two dial in the metal, the ARF dial is such a pleasure to look at.
So naturally what I did was to cut/shaved the ARF dial, and swapped it into the Noob baseunk:. With the addition of the CF bezel (more on that later), the watch is really close to gen and such a wonderful joy to look at. That fine jewelry like shine of a genuine Rolex piece is definitely present.

Now into the details (and pictures)

Coronet @ 12: general profile, 3-dimensional shape & light reflection;
ARF dial coronet is much more restraint, narrower and closer to the gen; The coronet is also finely made with nice curvatures like gen; it is also subtly more “3-dimensional”, and reflects light at different angles in a similar way to the gen;

Noob dial coronet has it’s fingers spread wider apart, and once you see it, you can’t un-notice it; the coronet is also flatter, with less curvatures at the edges, and less shiny than that of ARF, doesn’t bling and reflect light like the ARF;

Red Daytona Lettering at 6: color and distance from the subdial @ 6:
Both ARF and noob dial are little too bold, but:
ARF dial “DAYTONA” font is closer to gen than noob, and the coloring is darker, and has that fine & crisp “blood-drop” print height on the dial of the gen; however a little further up from the subdial @ 6 compared to gen; although at wrist distance it’s hard to notice; what is easy to notice is the dark red color and quality of the print, which is obviously closer to gen than the noob;

Noob dial “DAYTONA” sits right above the subdial @ 6, closer to gen than the ARF in position; again, this is hardly noticeable by the naked eye without holding it up real close; what is obvious is that the color is a “orange-pink” that’s far off from gen (subjectively and personally speaking, that color itself gives off a feeling of low quality); the dial print is also a little murky – which contributes to the lower-quality “feel”;

Dial & Subdial Print
This one is very obvious. The numbers on the ARF dial looks clean and crisp; the line patterns of the subdial ring runs into the number, but not so obvious, and it’s just like how the gen is;

The noob dial on the other hand, the print is fuzzy/murky and not crisp, and it’s as if not enough ink was used, the black subdial background is coming through, making the number print look greyish; This really gave a sense of low-quality to the dial;

Same thing with the 5-liner dial print @ 12, the ARF dial print is clean and crisp, nice “blood-drop” print height just like the gen; It really gives off a feel of a finely made high-quality dial;

the Noob dial on the other hand is bolder, murkier, almost like melting into the edges, and the print height is not very obvious;

Minute track print (See above pics for comparison)
Again, ARF’s print is thin and fine, nice “blood-drop” print height just like the gen; very high quality printing;

The noob on the other hand is a lot bolder and murky on the edges; the dial print on the noob really gave it a “replica” feel;

You can also see how superior in quality of the subdial number printing in the ARF in this picture;

Subdial height
It was really hard to show using the camera, but I think I managed it: the ARF subdial height (white portion) is a little bit higher and more obvious than the Noob

Also you can see the DAYTONA print between the two dials: in font, color, and print quality (crisp);

Dial Hourmarker: and polishing (could not capture with phone camera)
ARF hour markers are perfect; each hour marker is really shiny and reflects light in a jewelry kind of way, which you typically find on gen Rolex hour markers;

Noob hour markers are nice; but they are also not as well polished as the ARF, and doesn’t reflect light as well as the ARF; they are polished surfaces, but they just don’t shine and sparkle like the ARF;

Taken together, the ARF dial is of much higher quality than the noob, and it is a pleasure to look at. Now I must stress again, the obvious difference in quality of the dial is an observation as soon as you see the dial with naked eye. All the above-mentioned comparison details were identified afterwards upon closer examination in an effort to find out “what really made the difference”. I think there might be more factors that play into the higher-quality dial of the ARF, and I just haven’t explicitly identified them.

So it was obvious what I did next: cut the ARF dial and put it onto the noob, swapped the bracelet (clasp) over, and put the CF bezel on. The 116500 Daytona is now close to perfection, and I really can’t find any reason to go gen on this piece. I also have a gen crystal, but I don’t even think I need to install it (I’ll do it just to see if it makes a difference).

End result:

So to answer the original question of whether it's worth it - yes (IMHO). It was a bit of money and lots of work, but this you see in the above picture in my hand, is just F*amazing to my eyes.

Hope this is clear things up a bit for fellow members who had the same question as I did. I’ve benefited so much from all the info on the forum and it certainly feels good to be contributing some value. I have high resolution (relatively) photos if anyone wants to see them, just pm me and I can email them to you.

Any questions, feel free to comment and/or PM me.
Over and out.

Thanks again old_man for all the effort in this post.

 

[Edgematic]

Biggest difference between ARF dial and gen is the white color. Gen is more pure white while the ARF dial has a slight eggshell color to it.
Next to eachother the SEL's are close but not good enough imo.

The above remarks are only visible side by side though.

 

[M Scott]

More Noob V3 Black Dial 116500 Daytona pictures...
.

 

[SkyD9080]

Excellent reviews! Is there any lume analysis?

 

[Sjordan]

I may have over looked this but are there any replicas out there where all 3 of the chronographs work?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[M Scott]

I may have over looked this but are there any replicas out there where all 3 of the chronographs work?

Yes... Noob V1-V2, "V2.2", and V3...

Noob V1-V2 116500 -

- Released as V1 about July of 2018 with a 316L Stainless Steel case.
- Upgraded to V2 with a 904L case in August 2018 and the price increased by $100. Also some quality improvements to the dial.
- The first Daytona Replica with a complete Chinese clone of the Rolex 4130 chronograph movement.

ARF V2 116500 -

- Released as V2 in August of 2018.
- Uses a Chinese a7750 movement. The Sub-dials at 3 and 9 are non-functional.

 

[Aspherical90]

More Noob V3 Black Dial 116500 Daytona pictures...
.

Is it just the angle or the sub dials are back to being thicker than previous versions?

 

[nomana]

Is it just the angle or the sub dials are back to being thicker than previous versions?

I think this is the thin one for V3 (not thinner one showed on intime) and this better than v1-2

I saw one that thinner than this and it was claimed to be V3 but I’m not so sure.

 

[M Scott]

A couple of pictures to illustrate the differences of the current Gen, ARF, and Noob Ceramic Bezel Daytona sub-dials.
- The old V1-V2 version is included as some Noob V3 Daytonas are being produced with this dial.

116500 White Dials...
The current ARF and Noob versions are the same thickness as Gen now.
Right Click and Open Image in a New Tab to see it Larger...

116500 Black Dials...
The current ARF and Noob versions are both slightly thicker than Gen now and the Noob is much too shinny.
Right Click and Open Image in a New Tab to see it Larger...

 

[ginopino]

A couple of pictures to illustrate the differences of the current Gen, ARF, and Noob Ceramic Bezel Daytona sub-dials.
- The old V1-V2 version is included as some Noob V3 Daytonas are being produced with this dial.

116500 White Dials...
The current ARF and Noob versions are the same thickness as Gen now.
Right Click and Open Image in a New Tab to see it Larger...

116500 Black Dials...
The current ARF and Noob versions are both slightly thicker than Gen now and the Noob is much too shinny.
Right Click and Open Image in a New Tab to see it Larger...

what about the 116520??