The gen 116500 Panda over the years has had various shades of white. The ARF “creamy” white and the Noob white both will be similar to gems depending on which batch you compare it with. This topic has already been discussed on a separate thread on this forum. Any way the ARF dial printing and crispness and the shine of the markers is miles better than the Noob dial. In my opinion, the ideal Panda is Noob movement/case with ARF dial and CF bezel.
I'm awaiting the arrival of a Franken 116500 with gen black dial
It's the 116520. https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...-gen-black-dial-cf-bezel-and-prof-2ar-crystalDid you manage to find a gen 116500 dial?? If so wow congrats. Or is it a 116520 dial?
It's the 116520. https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...-gen-black-dial-cf-bezel-and-prof-2ar-crystal
It's a gen black Daytona dial - that'll do for me!
That was my thinking exactly... plus I have a preference for the older Rolies anyway, so dropping back to the previous gen dial is no bad thing.Ahah, that's ok, there plenty of gen 116520 with aftermarket bezels anyway
It's the 116520. https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...-gen-black-dial-cf-bezel-and-prof-2ar-crystal
It's a gen black Daytona dial - that'll do for me!
That’s interesting information m5smg2, thanks! I already have the ARF 520, and its shiny chrono dials are what attracted me, they contrast beautifully with the black dial. It’s going to be interesting getting the new watch side-by-side with it to see whether the SS or ceramic bezel looks better. I’ll post some pics once it arrives to compare that, and the gen/ARF dials.Mr. nobby congrats that gen dial is a grail. One thing to note is the sub dials on the 520 are noticeably shinier than the 500 dials. The 520 dials meant for the steel bezel are almost like a mirror. On the 500 they are toned down with much less sheen. So I imagine in person the 520 dial may seem “blingy” with the ceramic bezel. But the steel bezel would be perfection
Color- I really can’t spot a difference between this Noob 2.2 and gen. I’m sure gen has some variants over the years. My gen is a late 2018 model.
Crystal height. Gen is on top. We’re talking about fractions of a millimeter here, if you don’t know how to do it or opt to leave it as is, you cannot tell when wearing it or at arms length away.
Gen on top, V2.2 black middle, V2.2 white on bottom
Finally, the ensemble. Gen in the middle, other two are July-August 2019 Noob 2.2’s
Finally, the ensemble. Gen in the middle, other two are July-August 2019 Noob 2.2’s
Hi there, is your 116500 black dial Ootb? Your sub dials are not as shiny as most shown in this forum. ????
Ohh. Does the shine bothers you?Yes it’s OOTB. It depends on the angle, straight on they appear matte, while at some angles you can really get some shine.
IMO (not that it means much!) the ARF is the better looking watch OOB. That’s why we buy both and transplant the best ARF bits into the Noob case. If you don’t care that the ARF doesn’t have a 100% working chrono function (although the big second hand will go round, if you want it to), then you can save money and get a great looking watch by buying the ARF.I would love to get the Noob model but $688 feels like a whopper pricetag for a rep, I'm well aware people spend a bunch more to franken-spec their reps but how good is it OOTB? At this point I'm considering the ARF
IMO (not that it means much!) the ARF is the better looking watch OOB. That’s why we buy both and transplant the best ARF bits into the Noob case. If you don’t care that the ARF doesn’t have a 100% working chrono function (although the big second hand will go round, if you want it to), then you can save money and get a great looking watch by buying the ARF.
Here’s my Noob and ARF side by side, before they got merged (ARF on the right)...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk