Noob V2 Daytona - Is my bezel misaligned?

[5711]

Hi all,

I have just received QC pics for my Noob V2 Daytona.

Does my bezel look misaligned to you? Thanks.

 

[Suux88]

no, that's how they all are

 

[johnandtonic]

Hi all,

I have just received QC pics for my Noob V2 Daytona.

Does my bezel look misaligned to you? Thanks.

It does look off to me but results can be variable. Have a look at this tread, it has lots of recent examples and determine if you can live with it or not.

https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...noob-v1-v2-and-v2-2-daytona-vs-arf-v2-daytona

 

[5711]

It does look off to me but results can be variable. Have a look at this tread, it has lots of recent examples and determine if you can live with it or not.

https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...noob-v1-v2-and-v2-2-daytona-vs-arf-v2-daytona

Thanks for the reply. In comparison, this is the gen:

 

[Johnny_Ridden]

Ask for a different angle.

What are the timegraph results?

Generally speaking for the 4130, whats happening inside should be considered more important, as externals can always be fixed modded easier.

For example, you could just get a new ARF bezel, which is miles better than stock noob anyways, where as servicing a troublesome 4130 movement will cost you more money and braincells from headaches.

 

[Tobel]

no, that's how they all are

^ this, it's a common flaw in noob ceramic bezel

 

[johnandtonic]

Thanks for the reply. In comparison, this is the gen:

My point was to compare your watch to the Noob V2s posted in the thread by other members - not the gen - to determine if this a common issue. This is not a issue that I have seen called out in my research.

I do agree with the other posts here, the movement is critical and the bazel can be upgraded to ARF (if you can get one).