Sorry, but which one of John's comments provide any "substantive feedback" or merit like you mentioned? I'm not looking to argue, but I did take your advice, did a quick search of the "pepsi" and.. Lo and behold johnlogan spent $430 on the same replica. Granted his rep does look nicer with proper lighting and a jubilee bracelet, but the other than that the differences are marginal. Maybe I just need to snap another photo in the sunlight holding a cigar and maybe people will kiss my ass too.
johnlogan spent more money and he got a much better watch; there is no comparison between yours and his.
A per your request, here are things that are wrong, by no means full list:
Bezel teeth, size and finishing; insert pitting on the finishing; wrong material; numerals white and look clearcoted, insert misaligned, rehaut very dark, rehaut misaligned, ROLEXEOLEXROLEX etched incorrectly, dial markers overflowing and misaligned in places (eg 6'o clock marker), Cyclops AR, Hands are rounded, Case shape is wrong and edges too soft an vague, ICHS, Clasp is of very low quality, Etching not aligned, etching is wrong, if the watch is replicating a steel model then the bracelet is wrong
The watch you have is a pretty common quality for Canal St - the seller probably paid around $30-50 on DHGate or Aliexpress (etc)