The biggest question is how short that oysterflex is... the version 1 fits my girlfriend and she is tiny - I’d say the current (ver 1) oyster is for 6” wrist or under
Jesus that looks amazing. I tried on my oysterflex today (from 116655) and it looks like pure crap on my 116500. Is the 116519 strap any different? The problem is the fins under the strap protrude and the strap looks comically large on my tiny wrist.
Maybe u have a comically small wrist??? LOL
joke
The oysterflex is the same, however the strap is fitted with endlinks on the Daytonas, while the 116655 has the strap directly on the case.Jesus that looks amazing. I tried on my oysterflex today (from 116655) and it looks like pure crap on my 116500. Is the 116519 strap any different? The problem is the fins under the strap protrude and the strap looks comically large on my tiny wrist.
If Noob releases their version of 116519 Silver Gray Dial, then it's game over for me. Will franken it with a gen bezel and an ARF 904L bracelet and be done with it.
U need the endlink buddy. It looks funny without it.That I do! However the band looks horrible. Maybe I will get a Rubber B as I am really digging the look of the Daytona on rubber
Is it gen? The bezel looks off. See the 120 alignments and 6 clock no straight.
Is it gen? The bezel looks off. See the 120 alignments and 6 clock no straight.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
That's be an eye catcher for sure. That dial works really well with the steel bracelet
Is it gen? The bezel looks off. See the 120 alignments and 6 clock no straight.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
It's from the Rolex website. Below is a picture of the actual watch, courtesy of Chrono: