JF 16610LV gen vs rep pictural

[Doud]

Found this, however I cannot post the photos myself as I cannot access the browser version ever since RWI is back.

http://lingmoo.com/html/1201/1201.html?1

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Doud]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Doud]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nipe]

At first glance it looks pretty good but once you really start looking into details there is still a LONG way to go.

 

[Doud]

The date wheel is the first flaw they should fix, it’s obviously too thick across all their models.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[antale]

i believe that the ln version for the prints on the dial is better, however dw gen and xtal gen are obligatory,
i on my franken i also put the gen bezel assembly with insert gen and the crown gen 704.
The look to my eyes is fantastic.

 

[Swerepguy]

SEL-fit on the gen looks like shit?

 

[anthonygold]

A massive fan of this model, though I am happy to wait till all issues get fixed, if they ever do

 

[GingerBubba]

I'd just like to buy one! They're out of stock at the minute (the LN too). Bloody pesky RWI peeps buying all the watches I want!!!!
Shocking SEL on the Gen though, lol. The biggest tell for me are the crown guards.

 

[occb2]

That GEN is not Rolex. Might be a GEN Folex. It looks more like a TC with a real band. TC case alway fit their own band on well till about V6. So who ever built that GEN is using a TC case. That look just the way my 16610LV that I had that was all rolex but tc case. That was why I went with phong on my 16610LV.

Also a real 16610LV would not be bevel on one side so much and not on the other. Just not going to happen. Unless it was sent to a non rolex guy to buff or serviced a ton of times and they just didn't do the job well.

 

[watchtiger]

That date wheel and fat date font fml

 

[Alexsuh]

That GEN is not Rolex. Might be a GEN Folex. It looks more like a TC with a real band. TC case alway fit their own band on well till about V6. So who ever built that GEN is using a TC case. That look just the way my 16610LV that I had that was all rolex but tc case. That was why I went with phong on my 16610LV.

Also a real 16610LV would not be bevel on one side so much and not on the other. Just not going to happen. Unless it was sent to a non rolex guy to buff or serviced a ton of times and they just didn't do the job well.

I totally agree sir. I never see that much sel gap on gen. Its def a franken with gen dial,xtal,dw, hands and bracelet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[occb2]

I totally agree sir. I never see that much sel gap on gen. Its def a franken with gen dial,xtal,dw, hands and bracelet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea, Something is up there. I build 16610's all the time. My favorite. And I use the JF 16610. The older one with proper crown guards. I haven't done it yet but I can remove the rehaut engraving. But with a real bracelet it looks amazing. Only thing I can think is that the case is an old TC. It cant be a fake TC bracelet because they dont fit on a real case. You would have too trim the case lugs to fit a TC bracelet.

So I don't know who JF is trying to scam with their pictures. It is not a real watch.

 

[Dizzy]

I have the v1 JF and the rehaut is horrible and wokky. I can’t even stand to look at it. Plus the SH3135 hasn’t worked since day 1. I’m gunna try to sand the rehaut and turn it into a 16800 because that’s all it’s good for.

 

[lukko]

As you can see on this last batch of sub JF CG's are pure crap. Too short...

First batch of 16610 JF CG's was good... But actually are like shit...

 

[Conqueso]

Great review , can anyone tell me if the serial number (ie date on thet no rehault engraving version , is correct for that model and also the same for the one that has the rehault engraving , also , any advise or preference to which is more gen like the one with or without rehault engraving , thanks in advance

 

[Conqueso]

And also is jf version still best version on the market at the moment ?