ombre - Don't 2nd guess yourself. You did the right thing. What bothers me more is the tachometer second hand not resting at noon and that would've brought my attention to the coronet tilting slightly to the left.
IMO it's just because the watch is slightly tilted to the left, and since the chrono hand is not on the same plan as the coronet it looks like it's misaligned but it's not, and that's also the reason the coronet looks tilted but it's straight
this is a 3D watch so the dial the hands and the insert are all on different plans, when you tilt them left or right they move differently
ombre just ask for another picture taken dead straight to see whether there is indeed an alignment problem or it's just an impression due to the perspective
Folks here at RWI, you can't compare a watch to hand-held photos. And certainly not when taken with a phone, whether that be an iPhone or a Samsung or something similar… you will never get a qualitatively exact reflection in a photo than in real life. So what's the point of all this stuff on the web? I myself have a Daytona panda from CF, the latest version, and I am very happy with it. Definitely satisfied because that panda didn't cost me €50,000…hahaha.
Folks here at RWI, you can't compare a watch to hand-held photos. And certainly not when taken with a phone, whether that be an iPhone or a Samsung or something similar… you will never get a qualitatively exact reflection in a photo than in real life. So what's the point of all this stuff on the web? I myself have a Daytona panda from CF, the latest version, and I am very happy with it. Definitely satisfied because that panda didn't cost me €50,000…hahaha.
Some TDs take pictures with the watch flat on a surface (Hont for example). Granted there are no guarantees that the camera is flat when the pic is taken. However given how sharp and accurate these newer camera phones are I believe the pics are very detailed and allow us to make good critique on these watches. But be careful what you wish for because these pics show some very minor flaws that the naked eye will not see when the watch is on the wrist.
Folks here at RWI, you can't compare a watch to hand-held photos. And certainly not when taken with a phone, whether that be an iPhone or a Samsung or something similar… you will never get a qualitatively exact reflection in a photo than in real life. So what's the point of all this stuff on the web? I myself have a Daytona panda from CF, the latest version, and I am very happy with it. Definitely satisfied because that panda didn't cost me €50,000…hahaha.
Most of the time once we get the watch in our hands, these "imperfections" form the QC photos.. we cant even see them unless we have a loupe handy
As someone once said on the Rolex forum: Put the loupe away and enjoy your watch
I realised I can't spot the laser etched logo at 6 area?
I have a V1 and quite honestly I don't notice the long sub dial hands. Doesn't bother me one bit.