- 3/6/14
- 14,310
- 5,243
- 113
Far away from being that.in your opinion do you think this watch is NWBIG by this point? (The ZF and ABD v3 collab)
Far away from being that.in your opinion do you think this watch is NWBIG by this point? (The ZF and ABD v3 collab)
I understand, so the movement is ideal for enabling factories to rep the skeletonised watch design.
A good compromise between reliability and aesthetics.
JM, in your opinion do you think this watch is NWBIG by this point? (The ZF and ABD v3 collab)
Cheers mate.
I understand, so the movement is ideal for enabling factories to rep the skeletonised watch design.
A good compromise between reliability and aesthetics.
JM, in your opinion do you think this watch is NWBIG by this point? (The ZF and ABD v3 collab)
Cheers mate.
I agree with the above comments. We need to evaluate it irl.
But if I were to give an assessment from the pictures and provided it is irl as in the pictures, it could become the best available RM. And that would be as good as it gets when we are talking RM.
It all depends on the bezels pattern, depth and color. It’s so easy for a RM rep to look like a cheap toy if the bezel doesn’t have the right depth.
Regarding NWBIG QueTip already answered that one.
In the forum here NWBIG < first-class NWBIG < “Super rep”.
The term NWBIG is used for a watch that basically is a “super rep on the wrist”. Like “when not looked at the movement” and when only very small flaws are there.
In that sense I don’t think so.
For that you need a watch with almost perfect case shape, measurements and material/finish has to come close to the gen with the naked eye.
Here you have a skeleton watch where movement can be seen behind. The balance wheel at 5 isn’t oscillating. The colours of some of the bridges and wheel are probably not correct.
But I’m excited because we potentially can have the best RM rep right now in this.
The Seiko NH05A is an automatic movement (which like all automatic movements can be wound manually also).
The new rm035-02 ZF v3 looks insanely close to the original when considering price, the only real let down for me is the movement.
It's not automatic, it's manual wound. It runs at 3hz, not the original 4hz. And the balance wheel on the 'dial' at 5 is fake and doesn't move.
These flaws aren't a deal breaker by any means, but I'm curious why they went with the NH05A. I don't recall ever seeing it in a rep watch before.
Is it reliable? Is there something unique about it that made it the choice of movement for some RM reps? What are the benefits?
The rep producers always surprise us, so maybe it's not crazy to assume they'll rep the movement one day.
But is it worth holding out a for?
How i wish this statement was correct. But unfortunately ..
He was saying that yes it is automatic, but not all automatic movements can be wound manuallywait, it's not an automatic on the rep?
The gen RM35-02 does in fact have an automatic movement. I think you're talking about the RM35-01, which has a manual wind movement and isn't what this rep is.
Open question:
Aside from the movement balance wheel at 5 being a dud, are there any other clear tells with the 035-02 ZF v3?
yes, not all auto movement can be wound manually. Owners of Seiko mounting the 7s26 movement (a lot I believe) know the pain.
Based on this video,https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNDc5N...kuUgc_1.dtitle, it seems like the "richard mille" wording on the movement at 12pm should be black. The current V3s have this printed in gold/yellow.
How i wish this statement was correct. But unfortunately ..
Lol. 11 is the strap style, M the strap sizeAnyone notice that the strap says 11M water resistant. Should it not say 50M???