Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[QC] Rolex 114060 No Date ZZF V3 (2836 Movement) from GeekTime

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    [QC] Rolex 114060 No Date ZZF V3 (2836 Movement) from GeekTime

    Hey guys,

    Just received the QC pics from Eric over at GeekTime (not a TD here but on the other forums). I've gone through a lot of similar QC posts but would like the experts' opinion on whether to go through with this. I really appreciate the help here. This will be my first time getting into reps.

    I'm mostly concerned about a couple things:
    1. The bezel looks misaligned. It looks a little to the right. Could be the camera angle but you can also kind of see it on the third pic.
    2. The pip looks greenish in the second and third pic
    3. A smudge near the pip (may be able to wipe it off)
    4. Timegrapher was concerning +3-4 s/d, not sure how that is by rep standards

    Rolex 114060 No Date ZZF V3 (2836 Movement)
    Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ToIVR60

    Last edited by Samaritan; 21-11-20, 16:31.

    #2
    Jesus! Hope you didn't accept it...


    BTW - mind to read the RWI rules on QC pics?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by YellowFin View Post
      Jesus! Hope you didn't accept it...


      BTW - mind to read the RWI rules on QC pics?
      I haven't yet - any feedback as to why I shouldn't?

      Apologies - I'll update the OP with my specific concern

      Comment


        #4
        Question : Why buying from them ?

        You buy from someone not trusted here, yet it's here where you come to ask about QC ...

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Samaritan View Post

          I haven't yet - any feedback as to why I shouldn't?

          Apologies - I'll update the OP with my specific concern
          Sorry mate, your thread was asking for a little joke. The watch is fine. I'd also advise to go with a TD...

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by YellowFin View Post

            Sorry mate, your thread was asking for a little joke. The watch is fine. I'd also advise to go with a TD...
            Oh haha! Gotcha - thanks for the feedback. Geek Time is a TD in other forums and the subreddit. I was more concerned about the watch itself vs. the dealer

            Comment


              #7
              In my opinion only Rep owners spot the flaws in seconds, if you wear this watch outside and ask other people to look on it in distance nobody surely can spot it as a fake.

              For me ZZF and VRF are the best ones if we talk about out of the box watches.

              A genuine owner normally don’t know about reps like we do


              Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Glaude View Post
                Question : Why buying from them ?

                You buy from someone not trusted here, yet it's here where you come to ask about QC ...
                They are a TD in other forums and well known in the subreddit. I was more concerned about the watch itself

                Comment


                  #9
                  You really want it +/- 0-1 s/d.

                  I’d RL this all day broskihomie.
                  Tucker seems to be fallen into a pit of ignorance - Cavemax

                  But in this underworld of rep watches,it is clear that the normal thing is to play with the luck of the Seller's roulette - j.m.mozos

                  I wanted this omega so bad :/
                  I opened the box and got a star wars shampoo...cookienc10

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Tucker View Post
                    You really want it +/- 0-1 s/d.

                    I’d RL this all day broskihomie.
                    I had a feeling 3-4 was a little much

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Far far too much. No where near COSC...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by DiggerOfWatches View Post
                        Far far too much. No where near COSC...
                        Thanks for letting me know

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X