I rarely leave Buckingham Palace for these exact reasons
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I rarely leave Buckingham Palace for these exact reasons
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You're perfectly right. These thieving parasitic scum only crawled out of the sewers once Sadik Khan was elected. Before that London was a true crime free paradise.
Fucking idiot.
I agree with you. But I wouldnt use such forceful words to describe Super Khan. The Lefts and the Libs, could take significant umbrage. For using much milder terminology, national leaders have been termed bigot or rascist!
The reason crime nationwide is soaring is because of a lack police, increased poverty and lack of proper rehabilitation.
Sadiq Khan has nothing to do with those.
Repeated reelection of of conservative governments bringing public sector cut after public sector cut is the reason things aren’t improving.
You can’t just tell the police to catch more criminals without giving them the means to do so.
People wouldn’t turn to crime so readily if there wasn’t such a vast divide in rich and poor. You need welfare and wage increases to reduce the wealth gap.
You need money to fund rehabilitation programs, drug programs, youth programs.
You don’t get any of these things whilst cutting public spending.
So you think London was a crime free paradise before Khan was elected ?
Crime always rises in times of austerity . The 2008 crash happened and the government announced everybody is going to have to tighten our belts . By tighten 'our' belts they don't mean the rich or any of them . They mean us the hoi polloi , so public sector funding gets cut , benefits get cut , taxes go up , wages freeze , social housing gets shelved , youth projects get cut etc etc .
Historically it's not that London hasn't always been a violent city . Parts of London were some of the most dangerous and squalid places in the world during Victorian Britain . It has always been a city of the ' haves' and ' have nots' living side by side.
Any how's I have no such problems myself , being a violent criminal who has been sectioned under the mental health act .
Crime always rises in times of austerity . The 2008 crash happened and the government announced everybody is going to have to tighten our belts . By tighten 'our' belts they don't mean the rich or any of them . They mean us the hoi polloi , so public sector funding gets cut , benefits get cut , taxes go up , wages freeze , social housing gets shelved , youth projects get cut etc etc .
Historically it's not that London hasn't always been a violent city . Parts of London were some of the most dangerous and squalid places in the world during Victorian Britain . It has always been a city of the ' haves' and ' have nots' living side by side.
Any how's I have no such problems myself , being a violent criminal who has been sectioned under the mental health act .
Yeah - Leroy Dafuq - you know him ?
The reason crime nationwide is soaring is because of a lack police, increased poverty and lack of proper rehabilitation.
Sadiq Khan has nothing to do with those.
Repeated reelection of of conservative governments bringing public sector cut after public sector cut is the reason things aren’t improving.
You can’t just tell the police to catch more criminals without giving them the means to do so.
People wouldn’t turn to crime so readily if there wasn’t such a vast divide in rich and poor. You need welfare and wage increases to reduce the wealth gap.
You need money to fund rehabilitation programs, drug programs, youth programs.
You don’t get any of these things whilst cutting public spending.
WHY do you think the Tories have had to make so many cuts?
There are just certain sectors of society and culture that decide they should take what they want rather than earning it.
They didn't. The Tories cling to austerity out of ideology, not out of any kind of fiscal responsibility.
The two economists who wrote the paper the entire austerity policy is based on have since distanced themselves from it and admitted it won't work, and the chief economist of the IMF (an organisation who never subscribed to the benefits of austerity in the first place) has issued a statement admitting they didn't understand quite how much of a devastating effect it would have on the economy.
Don't kid yourself that the Tories are doing it for your own good - they firmly believe if you're forced to use food banks to feed your kids, it's probably your own fault for not being born rich. They're a party who, as it has just come to light, spent £200million stopping sick and disabled people from claiming benefits. When you're spending more money trying to stop something than it costs to just let it happen, at some point you need to admit it's ideologically driven.
Are you talking about the relative handful of people fraudulently claiming a few hundred extra in benefits each week, or the bankers/tax dodgers/Tory party donors claiming millions? Just curious.
Left wing Corbyn nonsense ...
its Not about being born anything you make you own chances. Most people are not fed wealth or success on a platter... you work hard , you play hard you might make it