• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

NEW NTTD No Time to Die Titanium/Titanium Seamaster 007 Edition

Lazza

Known Member
13/11/17
130
65
28
Yes I am. Since the Brosnan days.

The watches are just a small part of my Bond memorabilia. You haven't seen the rest yet :p


saw it the 2nd time last night and saw a few bits that I missed the 1st time, with this film you need to digest each scene, when i get this to watch at home, it's going to take me hours, I hope with this film they do it justice, with the extras. Have you been to Piz Gloria? truly amazing place, and will now be even more popular. also has a shop, that is not "online" so everything you buy there, you can only buy there. cost me a dam fortune. As for the watch this watch is unique and if you have seem the film you will know why. So a lot of people want it because of that. Not a big fan of Brosnan, a very weak actor and Bond, Dame Judi acted him off the screen, Goldeneye and TWINE were good. for me: Craig, Connery, Dalton, Lazenby, Moore, I prefer the Fleming Bond
 
Last edited:

Lazza

Known Member
13/11/17
130
65
28
[The true ending for Craig's Bond to me is the ending of Spectre when he and Madeleine drove off into the sunrise of London in the DB5. [/QUOTE]

Craig only come back to get the ending he wanted, was why Danny Boyle walked. I don't think any other actor in the future will have the power that Craig had, was a producer, designed the watch, picked his co-stars from Skyfall onwards and also the director. Barbara and Michael worship the ground he walks on. If Connery was given the power that Craig has had, he might have done OHMSS and felt a lot different about Bond then he did in his later years. I know Moore had some creative control over the character after TMWYGG as he hated hitting Maud Adams, but not as much as Craig had even before he signed his contract for CR
 

Lazza

Known Member
13/11/17
130
65
28
Wow!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was in Singapore on a stop-over for a few days in 2004 on the way to OZ and NZ then on the way back we stopped off at Hong Kong. I found the heat tough to take, as soon as we got out of the airport we were soaked in sweat, but a lovely clean place to visit, the Raffles bar was a bit special !!
 

Shane73

You're Saying I Can Sell?
8/5/20
39
14
8
[The true ending for Craig's Bond to me is the ending of Spectre when he and Madeleine drove off into the sunrise of London in the DB5.

Craig only come back to get the ending he wanted, was why Danny Boyle walked. I don't think any other actor in the future will have the power that Craig had, was a producer, designed the watch, picked his co-stars from Skyfall onwards and also the director. Barbara and Michael worship the ground he walks on. If Connery was given the power that Craig has had, he might have done OHMSS and felt a lot different about Bond then he did in his later years. I know Moore had some creative control over the character after TMWYGG as he hated hitting Maud Adams, but not as much as Craig had even before he signed his contract for CR

[/QUOTE]

Agreed the Spectre ending suited better they did end up giving Craig way too much say with the films which caused to many long gaps inbetween movies! Eons seriously backed themselves into a corner with the end of this one and maybe joining forces with a fan filmmaker like Christopher Nolan for the next one which will need to be an epic for a restart! Casino Royale did it right fresh reboot with a 21st century agent until Skyfall undid that they need to stop looking back to the 60's with the DB5 all the time. Probably just rumour mill from Omega i doubt anyone there would have a idea about where they are going with the film series next I bet Eon don't, I was in an Omega store 2+ years ago and the assistant manager was saying she had just attended an Omega event and showed me two Omega models that were going to be in the movie and they werent. I should have purchased that Spectre 300 Omega at the time practically doubled in value since.
 

KalKala

You're Saying I Can Sell?
27/11/18
97
31
18
elconquistador this is what it looked like when I took off mine….

Hei, thank you compadre...! ;)

Right now I have realized that also this close back case watch has that useless 'decorated plate': for me it's a BIG MINUS!
It is completely useless and it makes the simple maintenance a very tedious and delicate work.
Sometime back I also published a similar operation just to access the regulator... DARN!

Here, it may be helpful, eventually:

https://forum.replica-watch.info/fo...-asian-2824-disguised-as-omega-8400-regulator

I Salute You!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpchub

KalKala

You're Saying I Can Sell?
27/11/18
97
31
18
Oddly enough I have read that ORF has now made a decorated movement in their Seamaster 300m without the darn plate/case:

Movement engravings


What do you think? Does it look legit enough?

And above all, are these jewels, screws and regulator for real!? 8D
 
Last edited:

bertieng

I'm Pretty Popular
26/11/18
1,187
454
83
These decorative plates are totally useless as the NTTD is a closed back watch.
Can I just drop in an ETA2824 and close the back and call it a day?
 

imranbecks

I'm Pretty Popular
17/11/15
2,152
3,225
113
The Neutral Zone
These decorative plates are totally useless as the NTTD is a closed back watch.
Can I just drop in an ETA2824 and close the back and call it a day?

The reason why the reps still use the decorative plates even though the caseback is closed is because the gen has it too. Unlike various pics of the reps we've seen with its caseback removed, I've yet to see pics of the gen with its caseback removed. But one would assume that if the gen were to have its back removed, it would show the 8806 in all its beauty. So the rep only does it for accuracy because the gen would be like that as well if it had its caseback removed, closed caseback or not.
51584059950_a3c49fce2d_b.jpg
 

fantasma

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/9/21
65
26
0
These decorative plates are totally useless as the NTTD is a closed back watch.
Can I just drop in an ETA2824 and close the back and call it a day?

The fact that it has the plates means they put attention to detail.. personally I wouldn’t buy it if it didn’t have them, it would be a total joke to open it up and not see the beauty of the 8806 even if its “decorative” plates.. the definition of decorative is “to look more attractive”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayalvin777

pf78

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
23/6/17
1,261
2,949
113
managed to snag a vsf v2 before the raid but i was wondering whether i got a bad batch since the bezel insert looks a bit brown to my eyes, probably a pair of trained eyes can give me some insights






 

Danza1813

Tempus Fugit
Supporter
Certified
28/11/09
1,725
573
113
UK
Will VSF copy the enhancement parts??

3be0a913af7d6925634a80c8a890aa45.jpg

cdd06f32f2a1409fefb3b7216daeaa91.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Tennesseehorn

You're Saying I Can Sell?
6/1/07
30
1
8
Since the VSF NTTD watch is gone, maybe for good, now ORF (which I know nothing about) has come out with a version. Below is a picture that one of the TD's sent me and it may be the light but there looks like a stain on the face at 11:00 - 12:00 and "Swiss Made" is incredibly distorted when looking straight at the watch face. This doesn't seem normal at all. Can some of you pros look at this picture and tell me what you think or anything else that looks wrong? This is not a QC photo. I haven't bought anything yet I was just interested in the watch from another factory since VSF is no more. I'm confused.

Thanks
 

KalKala

You're Saying I Can Sell?
27/11/18
97
31
18
The reason why the reps still use the decorative plates even though the caseback is closed is because the gen has it too. Unlike various pics of the reps we've seen with its caseback removed, I've yet to see pics of the gen with its caseback removed. But one would assume that if the gen were to have its back removed, it would show the 8806 in all its beauty. So the rep only does it for accuracy because the gen would be like that as well if it had its caseback removed, closed caseback or not.
51584059950_a3c49fce2d_b.jpg

What BS are you saying? The 8806 has absolutely no decorative plate encasing the movement! Indeed its bridges and rotors have been engraved and decorated DIRECTLY, so once you remove the back of the case you do have easy access to the regulator's lever.
In the past to regulate the movement you had to completely disassemble the balance wheel and had to work on its body and spring to correct bits error and timing 'till they invented the regulator brace lever that makes it so much easier to correct the speed and exactness of the balance wheel oscillations by just opening the back of the case.

I have nothing against the 'decorated plate' but these are not only useless since anyone with a bit of horology knowledge will recognize the fake coaxial regulator by just seeing the true regulator hidden below the decorated junk, and they actually are an obstacle and a possible cause of damage to the watch when you have to disassemble the watch to operate on the regulator.
You will have to take out of the case the movement, remove all the hands, remove the dial and unscrew the ring below the dial that is holding the decorated plate. Just removing the seconds hand you can easily break the second pinion and even to free the winding stem or place it back can cause some displacement of the keyless work that will require to open the top plates to reposition all the parts.

They should really consider to find some different approaches:

# in the picture I posted above you can see a simple engraving and decorated movement from the ORF Seamaster WITHOUT any plate over it. To me that is perfectly acceptable and it looks nice and should also be more economical.

# find another simpler way to screw the decorated plate on the case and not on the movement so that if you need to remove it you will not need to take out the movement from the case, remove the dial and disassemble the watch just to access the regulator

# actually REPLICATE the 8806 COAXIAL movement so they can engrave and decorate its actual bridges and rotor
 

bertieng

I'm Pretty Popular
26/11/18
1,187
454
83
What BS are you saying? The 8806 has absolutely no decorative plate encasing the movement! Indeed its bridges and rotors have been engraved and decorated DIRECTLY, so once you remove the back of the case you do have easy access to the regulator's lever.
In the past to regulate the movement you had to completely disassemble the balance wheel and had to work on its body and spring to correct bits error and timing 'till they invented the regulator brace lever that makes it so much easier to correct the speed and exactness of the balance wheel oscillations by just opening the back of the case.

I have nothing against the 'decorated plate' but these are not only useless since anyone with a bit of horology knowledge will recognize the fake coaxial regulator by just seeing the true regulator hidden below the decorated junk, and they actually are an obstacle and a possible cause of damage to the watch when you have to disassemble the watch to operate on the regulator.
You will have to take out of the case the movement, remove all the hands, remove the dial and unscrew the ring below the dial that is holding the decorated plate. Just removing the seconds hand you can easily break the second pinion and even to free the winding stem or place it back can cause some displacement of the keyless work that will require to open the top plates to reposition all the parts.

They should really consider to find some different approaches:

# in the picture I posted above you can see a simple engraving and decorated movement from the ORF Seamaster WITHOUT any plate over it. To me that is perfectly acceptable and it looks nice and should also be more economical.

# find another simpler way to screw the decorated plate on the case and not on the movement so that if you need to remove it you will not need to take out the movement from the case, remove the dial and disassemble the watch just to access the regulator

# actually REPLICATE the 8806 COAXIAL movement so they can engrave and decorate its actual bridges and rotor

So it means the 2824 movement is actually encased in a decorative 8806 cage with the dial attached on the top of it?