A correct speedmaster co-axial seems to be on the way

[Chemicalz]

https://puretime.io/omg2018061302.html
Am i seeing right? A speedmaster without a deep date wheel and with working subdials? That actually looks good
Any opinion?

 

[NewFan0803]

That date window still looks too sunken to me

On the gen the window doesnt have any shadow

 

[Chemicalz]

Try to compare it with the other reps and see there is a GIANT difference, the datewheel was unreadable

 

[nunu78]

http://trustytimestore.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=352&products_id=18658

 

[jttou]

Height is 19mm? Lol, gen or rep - huge pass.

 

[Chemicalz]

Shouldnt be that one, at least the blue version seems different from jhf v2
lets wait till pt lists it up

 

[Nanook65]

Height is 19mm? Lol, gen or rep - huge pass.

I have to agree with this....
I can't imagine anyone actually enjoying wearing any watch that is 19mm thick. That is going to too be one uncomfortable hunk of steel

 

[BigBoo]

It's the same crappy version as before but with a functioning 3 dial (big deal). Same horrible grey printed bezel insert and applied mirror edge indices! The 9300 'Moon watch' unlike all the other Omegas in the '57' range does NOT have applied indices just a flat printed dial. This watch is not even remotely close to gen its super crap.

 

[BigBoo]

http://trustytimestore.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=352&products_id=18658

Those 'Comparison Pictures of Replica vs. Genuine' are not right. That is definitely NOT a gen, it's more like a Rep vs Rep comparison. I think they have mistakenly used the rep instead of the gen in those pictures.

 

[k4jun]

Those 'Comparison Pictures of Replica vs. Genuine' are not right. That is definitely NOT a gen, it's more like a Rep vs Rep comparison. I think they have mistakenly used the rep instead of the gen in those pictures.

You think that movement on the right is rep?

 

[tr573]

I said this in the other thread - there may be something hinky with that dial, because you're right, the black one should not have applied markers (the blue one does though, so maybe those are bad pics of the blue, who knows)

but - one of those has a gen cal 9300 movement in it, and a thinner case. so that much at least is not rep in those photos.

of these reps, the blue has the more accurate dial because of the markers OP, but the blue is supposed to be titanium and this is steel. Omega's titanium is not nearly as dark as like a Pelagos, so the look isn't horribly off as it could be, but it will weigh almost twice as much as it should.

 

[tr573]

you can see a comparison here, with a new blue steel PO next to old titanium one. Omega Ti is not nearly as dark as some other brands, so the color difference isn't as huge
http://elysiumluxury.com/blog/bigger-is-better----/

 

[BigBoo]

You think that movement on the right is rep?

I've no idea but the face of the watch is DEFINITELY not genuine

 

[Thefakemasterfanclub]

Wish they put a little more effort into this line of speedmasters.. such a nice watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[tr573]

I've no idea but the face of the watch is DEFINITELY not genuine

Okay, I downloaded the pictures. The reason the watch has applied markers on the dial is that it's not the SS/Black dial, it's the Ti/Blue dial - which does have applied markers. The lighting is dark so it's hard to tell, but if you download them and boost the exposure in photoshop it's clearly blue. It's a shame they frigged up the black dial by giving it applied markers like the blue has, and made the blue in SS instead of Ti so neither is quite right.