- 16/3/13
- 1,056
- 377
- 0
Hi,
I'm a noob at Hublot, i own one (Classic Fusion) and love it, but besides that I'm not an Hublot expert.
So I hope i'm wrong, but I think that Hublot Big Bang V6.5 should not be considered as a super rep. To be clear - I don't own a Big Bang V6.5, so please correct me if i'm wrong here.
Case thickness is one of the biggest flaws and a huge tell when it comes to reps. based on TD sites it seems that the thickness of the rep is 16mm and the gen is 14.5mm - this is a big difference (more than 10%!) and it is a tell you can easily spot.
I hope i'm wrong (i found this while considering ordering Big Bang V6.5 ) and the TD sites are incorrect - please share your info and thoughts.
Thanks!
I'm a noob at Hublot, i own one (Classic Fusion) and love it, but besides that I'm not an Hublot expert.
So I hope i'm wrong, but I think that Hublot Big Bang V6.5 should not be considered as a super rep. To be clear - I don't own a Big Bang V6.5, so please correct me if i'm wrong here.
Case thickness is one of the biggest flaws and a huge tell when it comes to reps. based on TD sites it seems that the thickness of the rep is 16mm and the gen is 14.5mm - this is a big difference (more than 10%!) and it is a tell you can easily spot.
I hope i'm wrong (i found this while considering ordering Big Bang V6.5 ) and the TD sites are incorrect - please share your info and thoughts.
Thanks!