I don't want to be "that guy" the TD hate. I'm trying to maintain a sense of balance. After all, these are low budget replicas, not tens of thousands of dollar gens. That being said...
This capital "O" is pretty much just a perfect circle. The capital O on a gen dial face is similar to a Times New Roman. (TNR)
O vs O.
There are three issues that this noob has identified, more experienced hobbyists might notice others.
1) The rep in question has the perfect circle, not the TNR type font.
2) The line below the ft=meter is compressed, making the alignment between the two lines off.
3) The base of the crown is a tiny "o", no horizontal stretch.
Do you accept it, or ask if they have a more correct version?
Or, alternatively, is there yet a different market to source a more accurate dial face?
As I said, I don't want to be "that guy" that pisses them off, but I don't want to be "that guy" that doesn't do due diligence.
Thoughts?
Thanks.
This capital "O" is pretty much just a perfect circle. The capital O on a gen dial face is similar to a Times New Roman. (TNR)
O vs O.
There are three issues that this noob has identified, more experienced hobbyists might notice others.
1) The rep in question has the perfect circle, not the TNR type font.
2) The line below the ft=meter is compressed, making the alignment between the two lines off.
3) The base of the crown is a tiny "o", no horizontal stretch.
Do you accept it, or ask if they have a more correct version?
Or, alternatively, is there yet a different market to source a more accurate dial face?
As I said, I don't want to be "that guy" that pisses them off, but I don't want to be "that guy" that doesn't do due diligence.
Thoughts?
Thanks.