N0tail_
Active Member
- 1/6/17
- 323
- 204
- 43
Gen (top)
OMF (Middle)
JF (bottom)
Are you sure the top dial is gen?
Gen (top)
OMF (Middle)
JF (bottom)
Why do you think that the jf hands are better?Gen (top)
OMF (Middle)
JF (bottom)
JF blue print makes it unwearable IMO.
The overall fit and finish between OMF and JF is comparable.
JF hands are better.
OMF print looks gen with naked eyes (not zoomed in pictures).
JF and OMF could have same bracelet supplier. They feel very similar.
Why do you think that the jf hands are better?
And can you post a pic of the thickness of OMF?
OMF middle case looks thicker than JF
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
really need a member with both to do a proper unbiased comparison
Are you sure the top dial is gen?
I'm honestly still having a hard time thinking the top dial is a gen. The tapisserie squares themselves are too sharp and it just looks like another OMF dial.
Maybe I used the wrong picture in compiling the comparison shot...I can’t tell.
Here’s another attempt:
mech500 gen (top), OMF (bottom).
Here’s JF:
Are you sure the top dial is gen?
Yep. It belongs to mech500.
Gen print essentially looks like OMF. Not sure why people are complaining about OMF.
Gen: