JF 15400 v4 VS quartz 15202 photos (PIC Heavy)

[d3xophen]

Here are some shots of them.
I won't review of them since there are many reviews about them on forums. Just show you to compare.
My wrist is 6.75"(17cm).
And my lens is not macro and I am not really good in detail shot on watches.
Hope you enjoy photos.

 

[d3xophen]

2 photos left. I am not expert to review them.

 

[lpl]

Is the 15202 DC Maker?

 

[d3xophen]

yes, it is. from sead.

 

[lpl]

May I ask how it compares to 15400 V4 in terms of fit and finish? Heard great things about the DC.

 

[d3xophen]

15202 quartz is not as good as 15400 v4 in terms of fit and finish. But in room light they are not different. In sunlight they are different but not very much like 400 vs 139. (My rating is if 15400 is 90%, 15202 quartz is 70% in terms of fit and finish).

The dial of 15202 is good. But AP logo need to improve because it need white in between A and P and finishing is not good like 15400 jf v4.

 

[majwilliams0308]

Very nice photos! My wrist is also 6.75", and the 15400 felt way too big for me. The 15450 is the sweet spot. Thank you for the pics, the 15202 looks very good!

 

[d3xophen]

That's why I will thin down my 15400 ss and rg in next month. Hope It work on my skinny wrist. 15202 is really perfect for my wrist. I did buy 15202 rg quartz too. Will post when it arrive.

 

[d3xophen]

More 15202 quartz photo.
You should try this one too. It fit perfect on my 6.75 wrist.

 

[MugenMachina]

@d3xophen Thank you very much for the photos! We have the same wrist size, I have the 15202 quartz and was thirsting for a 15400. I was debating the "too big" for my wrist idea -but 15400 looks perfectly fine on you in my opinion.

I'd say the 15400 is more casual/sporty, while the 15202 is more dress/elegant